Process for converting programs in high-level programming languages to a unified executable for hybrid computing platforms

ABSTRACT

A system and method for compiling computer code written to conform to a high-level language standard to generate a unified executable containing the hardware logic for a reconfigurable processor, the instructions for a traditional processor (instruction processor), and the associated support code for managing execution on a hybrid hardware platform. Explicit knowledge of writing hardware-level design code is not required since the problem can be represented in a high-level language syntax. A top-level driver invokes a standard-conforming compiler that provides syntactic and semantic analysis. The driver invokes a compilation phase that translates the CFG representation being generated into a hybrid controlflow-dataflow graph representation representing optimized pipelined logic which may be processed into a hardware description representation. The driver invokes a hardware description language (HDL) compiler to produce a netlist file that can be used to start the place-and-route compilation needed to produce a bitstream for the reconfigurable computer. The programming environment then provides support for taking the output from the compilation driver and combining all the necessary components together to produce a unified executable capable of running on both the instruction processor and reconfigurable processor.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE/PERMISSION

[0001] A portion of the disclosure of this patent document containsmaterial which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright ownerhas no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patentdocument of the patent disclosure as it appears in the United StatesPatent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise,reserves all copyright rights whatsoever. The following notice appliesto the software and data and described below, inclusive of the drawingfigures where applicable: Copyright © 2002, SRC Computers, Inc.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] 1. Field of the Invention

[0003] The present invention relates, in general, to adapting ahigh-level language program to operate in a hybrid reconfigurablehardware-instruction processor computing environment. More specifically,the invention relates to converting a high level language program into aunified executable that can run on a hybrid reconfigurablehardware-instruction processor computer.

[0004] 2. Background

[0005] As instruction processors continue to increase rapidly inprocessing power, they are used more often to do computationallyintensive calculations that were once exclusively done bysupercomputers. However, there are still computationally intensivetasks, including, for example, compute-intensive image processing andhydrodynamic simulations that remain impractical to do on modeminstruction processors.

[0006] Reconfigurable computing is a technology receiving increasedinterest in the computing arts. Traditional general purpose computing ischaracterized by computer code executed serially on one or more generalpurpose processors. Reconfigurable computing is characterized byprogramming reconfigurable hardware, such as Field Programmable GateArrays (FPGAs) to execute logic routines.

[0007] Reconfigurable computing offers significant performance advancesin computation-intensive processing. For example, the reconfigurablehardware may be programmed with a logic configuration that has moreparallelism and pipelining characteristics than a conventionalinstruction processor. Also, the reconfigurable hardware may beprogrammed with a custom logic configuration that is very efficient forexecuting the tasks assigned by the program. Furthermore, dividing aprogram's processing requirements between the instruction processor andthe reconfigurable hardware may increase the overall processing power ofthe computer.

[0008] Hybrid computing platforms have been developed that include bothgeneral-purpose processor(s) and reconfigurable hardware. An exemplaryhybrid-computing platform is the SRC-6E commercially available from SRCComputers, Inc., in Colorado Springs, Colo., USA. The SRC-6E systemarchitecture includes multiple general-purpose instruction processorsexecuting a standard operating system, e.g., Linux.

[0009] Attached to the general-purpose instruction processors arespecially configured Multi-Adaptive Processors (MAPs).

[0010] Unfortunately, an important stumbling block for users who maywish to use reconfigurable computing is the difficulty of programmingthe reconfigurable hardware. Conventional methods of programmingreconfigurable hardware included the use of hardware descriptionlanguages (HDLs); low-level languages that require digital circuitexpertise as well as explicit handling of timing. Thus, there remains aneed for processes that can take a program written in a high levellanguage and convert it into code that can be executed on a hybridreconfigurable hardware-instruction processor computer with minimalmodifications to the original program.

SUMMARY

[0011] One embodiment of the invention includes a method of convertinghigh-level language source code into a unified executable comprising:generating an object file from a reconfigurable hardware portion of thehigh-level language source code, and integrating the object file intothe unified executable.

[0012] Another embodiment of the invention includes a method of forminga unified executable comprising: converting a high level languageprogram into a control flow graph representation, converting the controlflow graph representation into a control-data flow graph representation,partitioning the control-data flow graph into a instruction processorportion and a reconfigurable hardware portion, converting thereconfigurable hardware portion of the control-data flow graph into ahardware definition language portion and the instruction processorportion into a instruction processor object file, converting thehardware definition language portion into a reconfigurable hardwarebitstream, converting the reconfigurable hardware bitstream into abitstream object file that is readable by a instruction processor, andintegrating the bitstream object file with the instruction processorobject file to form the unified executable.

[0013] Another embodiment of the invention includes a system for forminga unified executable comprising a partitioner to partitioncontrol-dataflow graph representations into a reconfigurable hardwareportion and a instruction processor portion.

[0014] Another embodiment of the invention includes a system for forminga unified executable that is executable on a hybrid reconfigurablehardware-instruction processor computer, said system comprising: ahigh-level language converter to convert a high-level language intocontrol flow graph representations, a control flow graph tocontrol-dataflow graph converter to convert the control flow graphrepresentations into control-dataflow graph representations, apartitioner to partition the control-dataflow graph representations intoa reconfigurable hardware portion and a instruction processor portion, acontrol-dataflow graph to hardware definition language converter toconvert the reconfigurable hardware portion of the control-dataflowgraph representations to a hardware definition language file, a hardwaredefinition language to bitstream converter to convert the hardwaredefinition language file to a bitstream file, a bitstream to object fileconverter to convert the bitstream file into a bitstream object file,and a linker to integrate the bitstream object file into the unifiedexecutable.

[0015] Another embodiment of the invention includes a computer programproduct comprising: a computer usable medium having computer readableprogram code embodied therein for causing a formation of a unifiedexecutable, the computer readable program code comprising, computerreadable program code for causing a computer to convert a high levellanguage source code into a control flow graph representation, computerreadable program code for causing the computer to convert the controlflow graph representation into a control-data flow graph representation,computer readable program code for causing the computer to partition thecontrol-data flow graph into a instruction processor portion and areconfigurable hardware portion, computer readable program code forcausing the computer to convert the reconfigurable hardware portion ofthe control-data flow graph into a hardware definition language portionand the instruction processor portion into a instruction processorobject file, computer readable program code for causing the computer toconvert the hardware definition language portion into a reconfigurablehardware bitstream, computer readable program code for causing thecomputer to convert the reconfigurable hardware bitstream into abitstream object file that is readable by a instruction processor, andcomputer readable program code for causing the computer to integrate thebitstream object file with the instruction processor object file to formthe unified executable.

[0016] Additional novel features shall be set forth in part in thedescription that follows, and in part will become apparent to thoseskilled in the art upon examination of the following specification ormay be learned by the practice of the invention. The features andadvantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of theinstrumentalities, combinations, and methods particularly pointed out inthe appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0017]FIG. 1 shows a system for converting a high level language programinto a unified executable according to an embodiment of the invention;

[0018]FIG. 2 shows a flowchart for converting a high level languageprogram into a unified executable according to an embodiment of theinvention;

[0019]FIG. 3 shows a flowchart for converting high-level language (HLL)source code to a hardware logic executable according to an embodiment ofthe invention;

[0020]FIG. 4 shows a flowchart for converting a instruction processorexecutable to a hardware logic executable according to an embodiment ofthe invention;

[0021]FIG. 5 shows a diagram for separating high-level language sourceaccording to an embodiment of the invention;

[0022]FIG. 6 shows a flowchart for converting high-level language sourcecode into control flow graph representations according to an embodimentof the invention;

[0023]FIG. 7 shows a portion of a control flow graph according to anembodiment of the invention;

[0024]FIG. 8 shows a dataflow graph according to an embodiment of theinvention;

[0025]FIG. 9 shows an example of a hybrid CFG-DFG segment according toan embodiment of the invention;

[0026]FIG. 10 shows an example of a dataflow graph with a conditionalaccording to an embodiment of the invention;

[0027]FIG. 11 shows an example of concurrent code blocks according to anembodiment of the invention;

[0028]FIG. 12 shows a flowchart for converting a CFG representation to ahybrid control-dataflow graph according to an embodiment of theinvention;

[0029]FIG. 13 shows another example of a dataflow graph according to anembodiment of the invention;

[0030]FIG. 14 shows an example of parameter versus local variable storesaccording to an embodiment of the invention;

[0031]FIG. 15 shows an example of a graphical interpretation of anop-code sequence;

[0032]FIG. 16 shows an example of DFG fragments built up from theop-code sequence in FIG. 10 according to an embodiment of the invention;

[0033]FIG. 17 shows an example of DFG fragments after removal of scalarparam indirection according to an embodiment of the invention;

[0034]FIG. 18 shows an example of a DFG block code according to anembodiment of the invention;

[0035]FIG. 19 shows an example of three array references used withembodiments of the invention;

[0036]FIG. 20 shows op-code structures of a subroutine call and thecorresponding block code according to an embodiment of the invention;

[0037]FIG. 21 shows op-code structures of a function call and thecorresponding block code according to an embodiment of the invention;

[0038]FIG. 22 shows op-code structures of a branch and the correspondingblock code according to an embodiment of the invention;

[0039]FIG. 23 shows a portion of a CFG representation with basic blocksand logic added to a center block to handle incoming and outgoing flowcontrol according to an embodiment of the invention;

[0040]FIG. 24 shows basic blocks with selector inputs tied to theblocks' OR nodes according to an embodiment of the invention;

[0041]FIG. 25A shows examples of op-code subtrees used with embodimentsof the invention;

[0042]FIG. 25B shows more examples of op-code subtrees used withembodiments of the invention;

[0043]FIG. 26 shows an example DGF for a loop used with embodiments ofthe invention;

[0044]FIG. 27 shows an example of a pipelined DFG without delaysaccording to an embodiment of the invention;

[0045]FIG. 28 shows a portion of a code block after merging according toan embodiment of the invention;

[0046]FIG. 29 shows a flowchart for partitioning CFG-DFG representationsinto a reconfigurable hardware portion and a instruction processorportion according to an embodiment of the invention;

[0047]FIG. 30 shows a flowchart for forming a unified executableaccording to an embodiment of the invention;

[0048]FIG. 31 shows an example MAP emulator system according to anembodiment of the invention;

[0049]FIG. 32 shows another example of a MAP emulator system accordingto an embodiment of the invention;

[0050]FIG. 33 shows a flowchart of a dataflow simulator according to anembodiment of the invention; and

[0051]FIG. 34 shows an example of token flow in a dataflow simulationaccording to an embodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0052] System Overview

[0053] Referring now to FIG. 1, an embodiment of a hybrid reconfigurablehardware-instruction processor system for converting a program writtenin a high level programming language into a unified executable 100 isshown. In an embodiment, the reconfigurable hardware portion of system100 may include multi-adaptive processors (MAPs) that may integratefield programmable gate array (FPGA) reconfigurable circuitry with logicto control the FPGAs and communicate with the instruction processorportion of system 100. In another embodiment, electronic communicationbetween the reconfigurable hardware and instruction processors in system100 may include using a switch/network adaptor port and/or a switch forlinking multiple MAPs to instruction processors.

[0054] An embodiment of system 100 includes a MAP ProgrammingEnvironment that includes MAPs, instruction processors, a high levellanguage (HLL) file to unified executable converter 104, supporthardware logic modules 118, user hardware logic modules 120 and aruntime library 122 among other components. In an embodiment of system100, an HLL source code file 102 is input into converter 104. The HLLsource code file 102 may be written in a conventional high levellanguage such as, for example, C, C++, FORTRAN, COBOL, BASIC, PASCAL,and Java among others.

[0055] The HLL file 102 may be input into converter 104 where it may beconverted to a unified executable 124 through the components of theconverter 104. An embodiment of converter 104 may include an HLLconverter 106, a CFG to CFG-DFG converter 108, a partitioner 110, aCFG-DFG to HDL converter 112, an HDL to bitstream converter 114 and alinker 116, among other components.

[0056] The converter 104 may include an HLL converter 106 that convertsthe high level language file into control flow graph (CFG)representations. In one embodiment the HLL converter 106 includes asoftware module including logic instructions for initiating atraditional compilation by reading the high level language source code,parsing the source code, converting the code into an internalrepresentation and a symbol table. HLL converter 106 may also includelogic instructions for performing syntactic and semantic checking of thesource code, and for generating appropriate diagnostic messages inresponse to errors in the source code.

[0057] Also, HLL converter 106 may include logic instructions foroptimization of the internal representation of the source code. Amongother things, HLL converter 106 outputs a CFG representation. The CFGrepresentation can be further processed either by the instructionprocessor compiler to produce instruction processor sequences, or passedon to another software module such as CFG to CFG-DFG converter 108 fordata flow analysis and generation of logic for a reconfigurableprocessor (e.g., a MAP).

[0058] In an embodiment, the CFG to CFG-DFG converter 108 may be asoftware module including logic instructions for receiving the CFGrepresentation created by HLL converter 106 and converting a CFGrepresentation to a control-data-flow graph representation. Thecontrol-data-flow graph may be used throughout the remainder of thecompiler phases. The CFG to CFG-DFG converter 108 may also optimize thedegree of parallelism in the compiled code. The functions of the CFG toCFG-DFG converter 108 may include: creating a control-data-flow graphfrom a CFG representation passed by HLL converter 106 that may be usedby the remaining components of converter 104, converting basic blocks toa code block in the data flow graph, converting input/output scalars,converting input/output arrays, dealing with scalar references in codeblocks, dealing with array references in code blocks, constructing loopcontrol, dealing with pointer references, dealing with calls toinstruction processor code, dealing with system calls to instructionprocessor OS, expanding intrinsic function calls, expanding externalfunction calls, optimizing loops, optimizing multi-threads, optimizingdata path and logic unit data widths, and optimizing structure includingthe elimination of unneeded structure, among other functions.

[0059] The partitioner 110 may be a software module including logicinstructions for sizing the logic to fit in the available resources ofthe hybrid computing system. The partitioner 110 may receive as an inputthe control-data-flow graph generated by CFG to CFG-DFG converter 108and may map the control-data-flow graph onto the available resourcessuch that performance is optimized.

[0060] In an exemplary embodiment, partitioner 110 may receive as inputthe following information: logic unit sizes from hardware logic moduleinformation file, chip sizes from resource file, interface size andspeed from resource file, data storage performance and sizes fromresource file, partitioning syntax input from the programmer, such aspragmas or directives, profiling information from control-dataflow graph(CFG-DFG) emulator and profiling information from the instructionprocessor profiling tool.

[0061] In an exemplary embodiment, the partitioner 110 may also includelogic instructions for annotating the CFG-DFG with the above informationand estimating performance parameters of sub-graphs based on executionin the instruction processor and the MAP. The partitioner 110 mayfurther include logic instructions for assessing the sizing of the logicand allocating the logic based on, e.g., the resources of the integratedcircuits and the MAP.

[0062] The partitioner 110 may also include logic instructions fordefining interface logic on the MAP and assigning MAP proxy code to theinstruction processor. The MAP proxy provides a target for theinstruction processor code that transitions to a thread of control onthe MAP. The MAP proxy accepts a call, and initiates any parameterpassing required to the MAP. The MAP proxy may also receives requestsfrom the MAP.

[0063] The output of the partitioner 110 may include a CFG-DFG that maybe implemented as logic in the MAP, and a CFG-DFG that may beimplemented on the instruction processor.

[0064] CFG-DFG to HDL converter 112 may be a software module thatincludes logic instructions for converting the CFG-DFG into a hardwaredefinition of the physical logic that will be instantiated in thereconfigurable processor(s) that in the MAP(s). CFG-DFG to HDL converter112 receives as an input a CFG-DFG file from CFG to CFG-DFG converter108 and converts the CFG-DFG file to an internal representation. Thehardware logic module information file is also read to provide nodeinput, output and latency information. Nodes and paths between nodes arechecked for compatibility and bit width consistency.

[0065] Some nodes are inlined rather than instantiating the node.Inlining refers to generating the hardware definition rather thanreferring to the definition as a instantiated logic module. All of thenodes in the CFG-DFG are checked for proper node dependency andconsistent data flow. Each node is then instantiated, and then allwiring connecting the nodes is declared. An output file containing thehardware definition language is created. The output file may be writtenin a hardware definition language such as Verilog or EDIF.

[0066] The HDL to bitstream converter 114 may include conventionalsynthesis tools for compiling Verilog to EDIF, and Place and Route toolsfor converting EDIF files to a bitstream that is loadable into MAP maybe used to process the output of the CFG-DFG to HDL converter 112.

[0067] The linker 116 may be a software module that includes logicinstructions for taking object files including bitstream object files,instruction processor files and other object files and integrating themto form the unified executable 124.

[0068] In another embodiment, system 100 may include a conventionalinstruction processor compiler (not shown) that may be used to compilethe portion of the high level language that is not converted to logic tobe run in the MAP.

[0069] System 100 may also include a bitstream configurator (not shown)that may include a software module that includes logic instructions forcreating a unified executable file. The bitstream file is encapsulatedas a compiled C routine that can be incorporated into an executable fileusing a compiler and standard linker. The executable containing theapplication instruction processor instructions, the MAP logic bitstream,as well as any required library code may be referred to as the unifiedexecutable.

[0070] System 100 may also include a Binary Translator (not shown),which is a companion tool to the converter 104. Converter 104 may takehigh-level language source code as input and create a CFG representationand a unified executable. The Binary Translator may take an executablefile and covert it into a CFG representation, and provides that to asecondary input to converter 104, bypassing the need for source code.

[0071] System 100 also includes modules 118 and 120 and library 122 thatmay provide a run-time environment for the HLL to unified executableconversion process. The run-time environment may include libraryroutines that are included in the instruction processor portion of eachapplication. These library routines provide support services for theMAP. This includes resource allocation and deallocation, communicationbetween instruction processor and MAP, debugging, and performanceanalysis. At least three distinct environments may be supported by therun-time routines: 1) execution with MAP hardware, 2) execution withemulated MAP and dataflow graph emulation, 3) execution with emulatedMAP and simulated user logic.

[0072] Method Overview

[0073] Referring now to FIG. 2, a method of converting a high levellanguage (HLL) into a unified executable 200 according to an embodimentof the invention is shown. The method 200 may start with the conversionof an HLL program into a control flow graph (CFG) at step 202. In anembodiment, conversion 202 of the HLL program to a specified CFG formatmay be performed by a conventional HLL compiler. Conversion 202 of theHLL program to CFG may include using a compiler to parse the HLL programinto CFG representations and to generate instruction code that isexecutable on a instruction processor. The instruction code may then bewritten to object files that may be linked together with a linker-loaderthat resolves addresses.

[0074] The programming language used in the HLL program may be aconventional high level language such as C, C++, FORTRAN, COBOL, BASIC,Java and PASCAL, among others. The HLL program may include a variety ofdata entities including scalars, arrays and user-specified aggregates,among others, and their associated operators. The HLL program may alsoinclude function calls, subroutines, loops, and conditionals, amongother operations.

[0075] In an embodiment of the invention, the next step of method 200may be the conversion of the CFG representations into hybridcontrol-dataflow graph representations (CFG-DFG) at step 204. Briefly,this conversion 204 may include separating the CFG representations intoits component basic blocks, adding load and store data to the top andbottom of the basic blocks, and converting the basic blocks into codeblocks of CFG-DFG representations. A more detailed description ofconversion 204 is provided below.

[0076] The next step of method 200 may be the partitioning of theCFG-DFG representations into a reconfigurable hardware portion and ainstruction processor portion, at step 206. In one embodiment, theCFG-DFG representations may be input into a partitioner program that mayscan the data and divide it into a portion for the reconfigurablehardware and a portion for the instruction processor. In anotherembodiment, the partitioner program may receive instructions from a userinserted partitioning syntax, for example a C pragma or a compilerdirective, that guides how the CFG-DFG code is partitioned intoreconfigurable hardware and instruction processor portions. For example,a pragma may instruct the partitioner program to put a particular loopoperation in the instruction processor portion of the partitionedCFG-DFG representations. The pragmas may be included in the original HLLprogram source code or may be provided directly to the partitionerprogram.

[0077] At this point in this embodiment of method 200, the partitionedCFG-DFG representations from the partitioning step 206 may be split intoseparate process steps. The instruction processor portion from partitionstep 106 may be converted into a instruction processor object file 208.In one embodiment, the instruction processor portion of the hybridCFG-DFG representations is converted back into CFG representations andthen may be converted into instruction code that is executable on ainstruction processor. The instruction code may then be written toobject files that may be linked together with a linker-loader thatresolves addresses. In another embodiment, the instruction processorportion of the hybrid CFG-DFG representations may be identified withportions of the original CFG representations and those portions of theoriginal CFG representations may be converted to object files.

[0078] Turning now to the reconfigurable hardware portion of the CFG-DFGrepresentations from partitioning step 206, this portion may beconverted from CFG-DFG representations into a hardware definitionlanguage (HDL) file 210. The hardware definition language may includeconventional HDLs such as Verilog and EDIF among others.

[0079] The hardware definition language file may then be converted intoa bitstream data file 212 that can be loaded into individualreconfigurable circuits in the reconfigurable hardware. For example, thebitstream data files may be loaded into field programmable gate arrays(FPGAs) in the Multi-Adaptive Processors (MAPs) used in the hybridinstruction processor-reconfigurable hardware computers of the presentinvention. In an embodiment, a Place & Route program may be used toperform the HDL to bitstream conversion 212. Based on the HDL files, thePlace & Route program may instantiate and interconnect hardware logicmodules for the reconfigurable hardware. The Place & Route program mayalso direct where modules may physically go and how they are coupled toeach other in the reconfigurable hardware.

[0080] In an embodiment of method 200, after the bitstream files arecreated, they may be converted into bitstream object files at step 214.The bitstream to object file conversion 214 may include converting thebitstream data into high-level language source code (e.g., placing thebitstream in a C structure) and converting the high-level language fileinto an object file that may be readable by a instruction processor.

[0081] In an embodiment of method 200, after converting the bitstreamfiles into bitstream object files at step 214 and converting ainstruction processor portion of the CFG-DFG representations into ainstruction processor object file at step 208, the object files may becollected at step 216. Additional object files may also be collectedwith the bitstream object files and the instruction processor objectfiles. For example, additional object files may come from previousiterations of method 200. Additional object files may also be taken fromprevious instruction processor compilations as well as from objectlibraries.

[0082] Once the bitstream object files, mircorprocessor objectinstruction processorfiles and any additional object files arecollected, they may be linked together 218 to form a unified executable220. In an embodiment, linking the object files 218 may be done by alinker program. The unified executable 220 may be readable by ainstruction processor that may execute the unified executable 220 toconfigure a hybrid reconfigurable hardware-mircoprocessor computer torun the HLL program.

[0083] Referring now to FIG. 3, a flowchart of a method of convertinghigh-level language source code to a hardware logic executable accordingto an embodiment of the invention is shown. The method may start withthe analysis of high-level language (HLL) source code 302 beingprocessed in a partition step 304. If a partition is found in the HLLsource code 302, then the code may be divided up and converted intocontrol flow graph (CFG) representations in steps 306 and 308.

[0084] In one embodiment, after the partitioned portion of the HLLsource code 302 is converted to CFG representations at step 308, the CFGrepresentations may be used to generate a MAP proxy 322 (see details ofMAP proxy in High-Level Language Converter Section), or be convertedinto CFG-DFG representations for hardware logic at step 316. For aportion of the CFG representations that results in the generation of aMAP proxy 322, that portion may then be converted into binaryinstruction processor code at step 324, then linked with all otherbinary files at step 326 to become part of a hardware logic executable328. For a portion of the CFG representations converted to CFG-DFGrepresentations for hardware logic at step 316, the CFG-DFGrepresentations may be converted into a hardware definition logic (HDL)code, such as Verilog code at step 318, then converted to hardware logicbinary at step 320 and linked with all other binary files at step 326 tobecome part of the hardware executable 328. The remaining HLL sourcecode 302 that is not part of the partitioned source code may beconverted into CFG representations at step 306. Then the CFGrepresentations may be converted into instruction processor binary codeat step 324 before being linked with all other binary files 326 tobecome part of a hardware logic executable 328 (i.e., unifiedexecutable).

[0085] For HLL source code 302 that does not have partitions, the entirecode may be converted into CFG representations at step 310 and may bepartitioned into a reconfigurable hardware portion and a instructionprocessor portion at step 312. The instruction processor portion may beconverted into instruction processor binary code at step 324 andultimately be formed into hardware logic executable 328. Thereconfigurable hardware portion may be partitioned and that portiongenerate a MAP proxy at step 322 while that same portion is convertedinto CFG-DFG representations. This partitioned portion may ultimatelybecome part of hardware logic executable 328.

[0086] Referring now to FIG. 4, a flowchart of a method 400 of operationfor a binary translator according to an embodiment of the invention isshown. In one embodiment, instruction processor executable 402 may beedited at step 404 so that it may become part of the hardware logicexecutable 426. In another embodiment, the instruction processorexecutable 402 may be translated into CFG representations at step 406.

[0087] After the instruction processor executable 402 is translated intoCFG representations at step 406, and coverted into a CFG-DFGrepresentation, it may then be partitioned at step 408 into areconfigurable hardware portion and a instruction processor portion. Theinstruction processor portion and any remaining portions of the CFGrepresentations 420 may then converted into instruction processor binarycode at step 422. The instruction processor binary code may then belinked with all other binary files at step 424 to become part of ahardware logic executable 426.

[0088] The reconfigurable hardware portion may be partitioned and thatportion causes generation of a MAP proxy at step 416 while that sameportion is converted at step 414 into hardware definition language (HDL)code (e.g., Verilog), which then may be converted to hardware logicbinary at step 418. The hardware logic binary may be linked with allother binary files at step 424 to become part of the hardware logicexecutable 426.

[0089] The MAP proxy generated by the partitioned portion may beconverted into instruction processor binary code at step 422 and thenlinked with all other binary files at step 424 to become part of thehardware logic executable 426.

[0090]FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate method steps that may be used in theprocess of converting a HLL program into a unified executable orhardware logic executable according embodiments of the invention. FIG. 4illustrates method steps that may be used in the process of converting ainstruction processor executable file into a hardware logic executable.It should be appreciated that additional steps and alternate sequencesfor the steps shown are contemplated in additional embodiments of theinvention.

[0091] Map Execution Selector

[0092] In an exemplary embodiment, a method is provided for identifyingregions of source code written in a high-level language that may besegregated and targeted for hardware logic, while other portions of thecode may be compiled for execution on a conventional processor. Anexemplary method uses special bracketing syntax showing which region(s)of code are to be executed on the hardware logic and provides scopinginformation for variables contained within the bracketed region. Thisinformation may be used to build the communication and data movementroutines that facilitate execution of region(s) identified to execute onthe hardware logic without further user intervention.

[0093] Many high-level programming languages include language constructswhich may be used to specify region(s) of user code that may be compiledand executed on hardware logic, rather than a general purpose processor.For example, in the Fortran language the syntax “!dir$” may be used, andin C the syntax “#pragma” may be used. Using these constructs, thesyntax to bracket the user code contains either the start or stopidentifier and the scoping rules for the variables contained within thebracketed code, and additional syntax for copying out privately computeddata.

[0094] For example, consider the following small Fortran procedure:program main ! parameter (n=1000) integer(kind=8) a(n), b(n), c(n)integer (kind=8) cc c common / arrs/ a,b,c c call initialize (a, b, c) cdo i = 1, n cc = a(i) * b(i) if (cc .le. 42) then c(i) = cc else c(i) =a(i) endif end do c stop end

[0095] This code segment first declares three arrays (a, b, c) that willbe used to hold data used in the computation. The arrays are declared ina common block, meaning their storage allocation will be in theinstruction processor's memory and not a local stack space associatedwith the procedure. There is an external call to a procedure that can beassumed to initialize the data in the arrays. After that initializationcall is a do-loop that contains the computation portion of thisprocedure.

[0096] The portion of code that has been identified to execute on thehardware logic is determined to be the loop body enclosed by the do-loopconstruct. Using syntax that is recognized by the compiling system whichwill generate hardware logic, the Fortran code may be modified toresemble this: program main ! parameter (n=1000) integer(kind=8) a(n),b(n), c(n) integer (kind=8) cc c common / arrs/ a,b,c c call initialize(a, b, c) c !dir$ start_MAP global (a,b,c,n) !dir$! private( (i,cc) do i= 1, n cc = a(i) * b(i) if (cc .le. 42) then c(i) = cc else c(i) = a(i) endif end do !dir$ end_MAP c stop end

[0097] Here the do-loop has been bracketed with pair of directives thatwill provide the information needed by the compiling system. Thecompiling system processes this information to build both the procedurethat will run on a general purpose processor and the subprogram thatwill execute on hardware logic.

[0098] The conversion of this single Fortran procedure into separatelycompilable procedures may involve several compilation phases. In onephase, the compilation system processes the individual source filescontained within the program, discarding from further reconfigurablehardware logic compilation source files that do not have syntaxindicating that hardware compilation is desired. When the compilationsystems encounters syntax indicating that reconfigurable hardwarecompilation is desired, the compiling system starts to build up theinfrastructure needed to implement the compilation of this source fileon both the instruction processor and the bracketed portion on thehardware logic. In addition to creating source files needed for theinstruction processor compilation phase and the hardware logiccompilation phase, the mechanisms used to allocate, reserve, and releasethe hardware logic resources are also generated.

[0099] The bracketing syntax may include scoping information for allvariables used within the bracketed region. This scoping information maybe used by the compiling system to build the correct data movementstatements and to ensure that the integrity of the program remains thesame as it would be if it had been run entirely on the instructionprocessor. Scoping data and variables as “global” indicates to thecompiling system that this data is persistent across the callingboundary between the instruction processor and the hardware logic. Themechanism that moves the data to the hardware logic and retrieves thedata from the hardware logic may be built into the new subprograms beingcreated by the compiling system. Global data may be handled in a similarfashion so that the integrity of the data is preserved.

[0100] Scoping data and variables as “private” indicates to thecompiling system that these variables are local in scope to just thehardware logic, and therefore their resultant values do not need topersist past the point of hardware logic execution. As a variation tothis syntax, there is an additional syntax that allows private data tobe “copied out” to a local variable in the instruction processor versionof the source file.

[0101] The compiling system can use this data scoping information togenerate two separate source files, each of which represents a portionof the original source file containing the bracketing syntax. One of thenew source files will be compiled and executed on the instructionprocessor's system. The other source file will be used to generate thehardware logic. This process is illustrated in FIG. 5.

[0102] High-Level Language Converter

[0103] A component of the compiling system that is invoked first toinitiate a traditional compilation phase, similar to compilation on anyinstruction processor system. This component receives as input anyprogramming language code and extracts from the source file(s) tokenswhich can then be parsed. While the parsing phase is taking place,semantic analysis may also be performed, so that after this phase aninternal representation of the code and a symbol table may be produced.Semantic error checking is done and the appropriate diagnostic messagesare issued.

[0104] The internal representation of the source code now generated bythis compilation phase resembles control flow blocks of code. The nextstep is to expand on these control flow blocks into the internallanguage that will be processed by the optimizer. During this expansionphase, each control flow block may be expanded into units called eitherbasic blocks or extended basic blocks. A flow graph may be a directedgraph of the basic blocks in a function, which represents the function'scontrol flow. Each node in the graph corresponds to a basic block. Theflow graph may be updated during compilation as optimizations occur. Themajor global optimizations performed during this step may includeinvariant code motion; induction variable analysis; and, global registerassignment. Other optimizations may include the merging of code blocksas well as peephole optimizations that result in optimized control flowcode blocks.

[0105] After the global register assignment optimization, the callingparameters of the routine may be written to an intermediate file thatmay be used as the input into the next compilation phase. The callingparameters are written along with their data types, followed by the usersymbols associated with the routine and their data types. After writingout the symbols used in the routine, the next portion of the filecontains the traversal of the terminal code blocks showing the type ofbasic block represented and the instructions associated with the codeblock. Once this control flow representation has been produced, thefinal step produces all the instructions that were generated during thecompilation of the routine. These instructions may correspond to theinstructions listed in the control flow blocks.

[0106] As is the case for any architecture, a compiler is required toprocess a program written in higher-level languages into equivalentprograms in a machine language for execution on a computer. System 100satisfies the above requirement with the ability to translate programsfor a traditional instruction processor alone, or in combination with areconfigurable processor. The compiler phase used to translate thishigher-level language is based on instruction processor compilertechnology. The HLL converter uses a mixed model of compilation withlanguage-specific front-ends to generate a common high-levelintermediate representation. This first level of representation is theninput into various basic optimizations, including control flow analysis,so that the resulting second-level intermediate representation can bereferred to as a control flow representation. The control flowrepresentation becomes a major component in the control flow informationfile that is generated as output by the HLL converter. The followingtext provides additional details on the contents of this file and alsothe additional files that can be produced as a result of this stage ofcompilation.

[0107] Input to the HLL converter can consist of two different types ofsource code. Any higher-level language source code can used as inputinto the HLL converter, provided that this code is written to conform tothe language standards which it represents. Another input to the HLLconverter is source code that represents control flow information forthe higher-level language originally represented. This control flowinformation has been written to a well-defined interface specificationso that control flow information from a previous compilation can be used(as described later) or control flow information that has been derivedfrom another source, such as another uP executable, can be used.

[0108] After the control flow analysis has revealed the hierarchicalflow of control within each procedure, a representation of the controlflow can be generated as an intermediate language. The control flowinformation file that is produced at this point contains, but is notnecessarily limited to, the following: entry symbols, user symbols,basic blocks, and intermediate representation instructions, amongothers.

[0109] Entry symbols represent the symbols created by the HLL converterthat will be the parameters passed in a calling routine, which serves asthe interface between the instruction processor portion of theexecutable and the hardware logic. These symbols may pass addresses ofdata that will accessed by the hardware logic as well as scalar valuesfor computation.

[0110] User symbols are the symbols that represent the variables in theregion of code being compiled for hardware logic. These symbolscorrespond to variable names in the higher-level source code, includingconstructs such as arrays and structures. Symbols may also represent anyexternal routine calls; it is here that hardware logic modules may bevisible in the compilation process.

[0111] A basic block may be a maximal sequence of instructions that canbe entered only at the first of them and exited only from the last ofthem. The basic blocks representing the given source code are listedhere. Every basic block starts with a block information header entry.This entry provides the relative block number, the source line numberthat this basic block represents, the label defined by this block (ifone exists) as it is represented in the associated symbol table.Following this information is a list of flags representing attributesfor these basic blocks. These flags provide more information about theblock such as if this block contains the entry to the procedure; if thisblock has any external references; and, if this block's control fallsthrough to its immediate successor. Immediately following the blockinformation header line is a list of the instructions that representterminal nodes. Examples of these types of instructions are stores ofdata to memory, unconditional or conditional branches or procedurecalls. Each terminal node is represented by its relative number withinthe basic block, the line number which points to the “tree” ofinstructions representing the statement, and then flags that providemore information on that node.

[0112] The instructions referenced by the basic block section may belisted in the intermediate representation instructions. This sectioncontains the individual instructions that have been generated duringcompilation and used for optimizations up to this point. Theseinstructions have been grouped into basic blocks and their relationshipwith one another has already been established in the previous section.They are generated here in the order that they were created during thecompilation process.

[0113] The first entry is the relative number of the instruction in thisinstruction list. Next is the instruction name, followed by each of theoperands for this instruction. Information for operands may be providedif the operand is a label pointing to an entry in a table of variableand entry point names. Internally generated names from the compilationare also shown. Information may be provided about the datasizes beingloaded or stored from memory. More details on the types of instructionsthat can be referenced in the control flow information file are given inthe interface specification section.

[0114] The generation of the control flow information file is based onoptions provided either in the compilation command line or in the sourcecode itself. Adding an option to the compilation command designateswhich subprogram contained within a larger source file of subprograms isto be targeted for hardware logic. During compilation, only thedesignated subprogram will have its control flow information written outto a separate file for further hardware logic compilation. The remainingsource code subprograms will be compiled to generate the instructionprocessor machine code.

[0115] Control flow information files can also be generated based on theexistence of partitioning, or bracketing, syntax that is recognized andparsed by the compiler. This partitioning syntax is used in conjunctionwith language-specific source lines such that, if this source code iscompiled for a different architecture then the partitioning syntax maybe ignored during compilation. Keywords defined for this syntax enable aregion of the entire source code to be extracted and compiled as aseparate subprogram for hardware logic. As described above with thecommand line option, only this specially bracketed region will have itscontrol flow information written out to a separate control flowinformation file for further hardware logic compilation.

[0116] If no partitioning syntax is present in the code and there is nocommand line option to designate a specific subprogram as being targetedfor hardware logic compilation, then the compiler may default tocompiling the entire source code as a candidate for hardware logic. Thecontrol flow information about each subprogram may be written out andpassed along for further compilation. The next compilation step will dothe analysis needed in determining the best point in the control flowfor partitioning to create a subset control flow information file. Thisnew control flow information file is passed back to the HLL converter tocreate the necessary MAP proxy routines needed.

[0117] The compiler utilized to generate a control flow information filefrom a higher-level language or to process a previously generatedcontrol flow information file must also create various other proceduresthat provide the necessary functionality for hardware logic execution.These procedures provide functionality by supporting an interfacebetween the execution of the code on the uP processor and the executionof the code on the reconfigurable processor. This interfacefunctionality is termed, “MAP proxy”. FIG. 6 shows an example of theinterface functionality.

[0118] Code contained in the control flow information file 610 mayinclude the region of source code that will be executed on the hardwarelogic. That file continues through the compilation process with theresult being FPGA bitstreams suitable for hardware logic execution.

[0119] Code contained in the MAP proxy 615 may be scheduled forexecution on the instruction processor in place of the region of controlflow information that has been partitioned for execution on hardwarelogic. This code handles the data movement needed in support of thehardware logic execution by inserting data manipulation constructs thatare appropriate for the target reconfigurable processor. The MAP proxyalso may insert runtime library calls used when executing to interactwith the operating system. This interaction includes the allocation ofhardware logic resources; querying of hardware logic status; the releaseof hardware logic resources back to the system; and, the transfer ofcontrol from the instruction processor process to the hardware logic.

[0120] The final step for the HLL converter is to generate the machinecode needed to execute on the targeted instruction processor processor.The HLL converter produces control flow information for the entiresource code and also the MAP proxy code. This information is thentranslated down to the machine code, so that the binary files producedfrom this compilation can be used as input into the linking step thatwill result in the unified executable.

[0121] Hardware Logic Module Information Files: Concept and Structure

[0122] Another component of the compilation system is a data base thatdescribes the mapping of the operators, intrinsic function calls, andprocedure calls in the source of the MAP procedure to existing (systemdefined) hardware logic modules. The database is called the system infofile.

[0123] Optionally, a user may define additional hardware logic moduleswhich may be called as if calling a procedure in the source of a MAPprocedure, or which may be used to redefine the intrinsic system definedhardware logic modules described in the system info file. In order tocompile for MAP using user defined hardware logic modules, the user mustprovide a data base which maps the procedure name or operator overloadto the user defined hardware logic module. This database is called theuser info file.

[0124] Every opcode in the nodes of a dataflow graph representation ofthe MAP procedure being compiled must be defined in an info file entry.

[0125] Hardware logic module information files are used by both the CFGto CFG-DFG converter dataflow graph generator and by the CFG-DFG to HDLconverter Verilog generation phases of compilation.

[0126] A hardware logic module information file includes of one or moreentries concatenated into a single file. Each entry describes a uniqueoperation (op-code) represented in the dataflow graph or a function orsubroutine that has been instantiated thru a call from the MAP procedurebeing compiled. This description includes an interface to the hardwarelogic module that is to be instantiated to perform the operation,including it's inputs, outputs, any input or output signals the moduleis to be connected to, and characteristics of the hardware logic module.Optionally, an entry may contain functionally equivalent pseudo codethat may be used in dataflow graph emulation mode, or various simulationmodes to emulate/simulate the modules functionality.

[0127] A hardware logic module information file entry is delimited witha begin-def and end-def marker, and takes the form: BEGIN_DEF “<opcode>”<mapping and emulation information> END_DEF

[0128] The <opcode> is the ASCII string matching the op-code in thedataflow graph corresponding to the operation, or the name of aprocedure called in the source code of the MAP procedure. The <mappingand emulation information> consists of a sequence of entries, eachending with a semicolon. The order of these sections of the hardwarelogic module information file entries does not matter.

MACRO=“<macro_name>”;

[0129] The <macro_name> is the ASCII string representing the name of thehardware logic module that performs the function of the operation orprocedure the hardware logic module information file entry describes.

LATENCY=<num>;

[0130] The <num> is an integer value specifying the number of clockcycles between the presentation of data to the hardware logic module'sinputs and the availability of corresponding results on the outputs.

STATEFUL=YES|NO;

[0131] YES indicates the hardware logic module holds state betweeniterations, typically in an internal register; NO indicates it does not.

EXTERNAL=YES|NO;

[0132] YES indicates the hardware logic module interacts with entitiesoutside of its code block; NO indicates it does not.

PIPELINED=YES|NO;

[0133] YES indicates the hardware logic module is pipelined such that itcan accept new inputs each clock; NO indicates it is not.

INPUTS=<num>:<input specs>;

OUTPUTS=<num>:<output specs>;

[0134] <num> is the number of inputs or outputs to the operation orprocedure in the source of the MAP procedure, or to the node whichrepresents it in the dataflow graph. There must be <num> input or outputspecs specified in the INPUTS or OUTPUTS specifier.

[0135] Each <input spec> takes the form:

I<n>=<type><nbits> BITS (<input_port_name>)

[0136] Each <output spec> takes the form:

O<n>=<type><nbits> BITS (<output_port_name>)

[0137] <n> is an integer that specifies the zero based input or outputsequence number to the operation or procedure call in the source of theMAP procedure or in the node of the dataflow graph. The numbering of theinputs and outputs is independent; each begins at zero.

[0138] <type> is the data type of the input or output. It may be INT,FLOAT, or ADDRESS. (This will be expanded to include additional types,COMPLEX, LOGICAL, REAL, INTEGER, CHAR, CHARACTER). <input_port_name> and<output_port_name> represent the corresponding input or output portnames of the associated hardware logic module.

IN_SIGNAL:<nbits> BITS “<macro_port_name>”=“<internal_signal_name”;

OUT_SIGNAL:<nbits> BITS “<macro_port_name>”=“<internal_signal_name”;

[0139] These describe hardware logic module connections which are notvisible at the source code or dataflow graph level. <nbits> is the nuberof bits of the input or output signal. <macro_port_name> is the name ofthe signal into (IN_SIGNAL) or out (OUT_SIGNAL) of the hardware logicmodule. <internal_signal_name> is the name of the source (IN_SIGNAL) ortarget (OUT_SIGNAL) signal in the compiled hardware logic.

[0140] There are currently three internal source signals available:

[0141] CLOCK

[0142] rst

[0143] code_block_reset

[0144] CLOCK is the clock source for all hardware logic modules. rst isthe one-time global reset. code_block_reset is a reset signal that isactivated anytime a hardware logic module's code block is activated.

[0145] There are currently no documented signals to target. These willinclude error, overflow, or exception conditions detected duringexecution of the hardware logic module in the future.

DFG=#<simcode>#

[0146] <simcode> is C code which is used as an functional definition ofthe hardware logic module's behavior during dataflow emulation.

[0147] Syntax extensions are planned to the hardware logic moduleinformation file entries to specify variations of these or additionalcharacteristics of the hardware logic modules. These characteristicvariations and additions include, but are not limited to the descriptionof hardware logic modules which can accept new inputs each n iterations,which can accept inputs for n iternations and produce i results after jclock periods, a means to specify the frequency at which a hardwarelogic module executes, actual code or a directory path to a filecontaining HDL code which define the hardware logic module forsimulation, and a specification of resource requirements for thehardware logic module.

[0148] Translating Hardware Logic Module Information Files

[0149] In addition to the data flow graph, there is a second input fileto the CFG-DFG to HDL converter. This is a CFG-DFG to HDL converterbinary file containing the interfaces and information about the hardwarelogic modules contained in the hardware logic module information files.In an embodiment of the present invention, a small executable may beused which translates the ASCII hardware logic module information fileinto CFG-DFG to HDL converter internal tables and is executed duringcompilation prior to invoking the CFG-DFG to HDL converter.

[0150] This translation program may be invoked with one required and twooptional command line options. The required option, -o outfile,indicates the name of the output file where the CFG-DFG to HDL convertertables are to be written. The option -d deleted_signal indicates thename of an input or output signal in the hardware logic moduleinformation file to be ignored; that is, the translation program willskip processing of a signal named deleted_signal in an hardware logicmodule information file which is specified in a -d option. This allowsan hardware logic module information file entry for a hardware logicmodule to contain test signals or signals used in simulation that maynot exist when generating actual hardware logic. The second optionalcommand line argument is -r sigval=newsigval. The translation programreplaces occurrences of pin or wire names specified by sigval in thehardware logic module information file with the string newsigval in theresulting CFG-DFG to HDL converter table. This option allows renamingthe hardware logic module's input and output signals which are to beconnected by the CFG-DFG to HDL converter. The CFG-DFG to HDL convertermay ignore any connections that are to be connected to a wire whose namebegins with “unconnected_”. By renaming “unconnected_” wires with thisoption, they may be processed by the CFG-DFG to HDL converter. As withthe -d option, -r is useful when generating an HDL like Verilog whichwill be used in a test bench or simulation environment and that may havesignals that are not actually present in the generated Verilog for theresulting hardware logic. Multiple -d and -r options may be specified.

[0151] The translation program may start by initializing the CFG-DFG toHDL converter tables to be built, calling gr_tables_init in the CFG-DFGto HDL converter support library. Next the command line options may beprocessed. An array of character pointers is built containing the listof deleted signals specified by the -d command line options. Twoparallel arrays of character pointers are built for the renamed signals(-r option). The first array contains the strings specified by sigval inthe option, the second array contains the strings specified by newsigvalin the option. For a given renamed signal in the first array, itscorresponding new name is located at the same index in the second array.The output file name specified with the -o option is inserted into theCFG-DFG to HDL converter OUTPUT_FILES table.

[0152] After tables are initialized and the command line is processed,the hardware logic module information file(s) are parsed and an array ofsubref data structures is constructed. There may be two hardware logicmodule information files containing an arbitrary number of entries. Onehardware logic module information file is assumed to contain interfaceswhich map the opcodes which appear in nodes of the data flow graph tospecific hardware logic modules known to the compilation system (theintrinsic operations). This hardware logic module information file iscalled the system hardware logic module information file, and is locatedby reading a environment variable. The second hardware logic moduleinformation file, which is optional, contains interfaces to userprovided hardware logic modules which are not intrinsically know to thecompiler, as well as any user provided redefinitions of any of theintrinsic hardware logic modules. Parsing of the hardware logic moduleinformation file and creation of the array of subref structures isperformed by a function shared with CFG to CFG-DFG converter,fetch_all_subrefs. The parser and semantic routines of fetch_all_subrefsmay be generated by the gnu tools flex and bison.

[0153] A subref structure is used to store the information in thehardware logic module information files internally to the translatorprogram and The CFG to CFG-DFG converter. As each opcode info filedefinition is parsed, the information is stored into a subref structure.Parsing continues until all the hardware logic module information fileentries have been parsed, and an array of subref structures has beenbuilt. The translator program then enters loops thru the arrayprocessing one subref structure at a time while building the CFG-DFG toHDL converter tables which hold the hardware logic module interfaces.

[0154] The CFG-DFG to HDL converter tables built from the processing ofthe subref structures are EQUIV_IN, EQUIV_OUT, EQUIV_IN_PRS, PIN_NAMES,HELD, BEHAV_V, and BEHAV_C. The content of each of these tables isindicated in the discussion of subref structure processing (below).There is one EQUIV_IN and one EQUIV_OUT table entry created for eachsubref structure processed. The table index for the EQUIV_IN andEQUIV_OUT table entries for a given subref are the same.

[0155] Processing of a subref structure begins by checking the opcodename field of the subref structure. If no name was specified in thehardware logic module information file entry, an error is issued and therest of the current subref structure is skipped. If a name is specified,the CFG-DFG to HDL converter tables built from previous subrefprocessing are searched for a previous subref with the same opcode name.If one is found, a warning may be issued, and further processing of theduplicate named subref may be skipped; the first hardware logic moduleinformation file entry for the opcode name is used. Note that the user'sinfo file entries are the first entries parsed, and their correspondingsubref structures appear in the array of subrefs with the smallest arrayindices. Thus, a user may provide their own hardware logic module forany given opcode which is intrinsically known to the compiler, and dueto the order of processing of the subref array, the user's info fileentry for that opcode overrides any entry in the system's info file.

[0156] The index of the first free entry in the EQUIV_IN_PRS is savedand will later be placed in the EQUIV_IN table entry for the currenthardware logic module information file entry. This is used to locate thefirst input parameter for the hardware logic module. The latency for thehardware logic module is also save for later insertion into theEQUIV_OUT table entry for the current info file entry. If the latency isnot specified or if it is negative, and error is issued and a value ofzero is used for the latency.

[0157] The output parameters may be processed first. For each output, anEQUIV_IN_PRS table entry is created. The output's bit width and theindex to the EQUIV_IN/EQUIV_OUT table entries for this subref areinserted into the EQUIV_IN_PRS table entry. A flag indicating this is anoutput is also set in the EQUIV_IN_PRS table entry, distinguishing itfrom an input. A PIN_NAMES table entry is then created for the outputparameter. A PIN_NAMES table entry has the output parameter's name, it'swidth in bits, the index to it's previously created EQUIV_IN_PRS tableentry, the index of the current subref's EQUIV_IN/EQUIV_OUT table entry,and a flag indicating this is an output pin set. If this is the firstPIN_NAMES table entry created for the current subref (the first outputparameter processed for the module), the PIN_NAMES table index is savedfor later insertion into the EQUIV_OUT table for the current subref.

[0158] The output signals for the opcode are processed after the outputparameters. The list of deleted signals specified by -d command lineoptions is searched to determine if the output signal should be enteredinto the CFG-DFG to HDL converter HELD and PIN_NAMES tables. If it isfound, the signal is skipped; otherwise a HELD table entry is created.The HELD table entry contains the index to the associated PIN_NAMEStable entry for the signal, the bit width of the signal, and the name ofthe external signal the output signal should be connected to. The tableof renamed signals specified by -r command line options may be searchedto see if the signal has been remapped. If it has, the remapped signalname is used; otherwise the name specified in the hardware logic moduleinformation file is used. If no external signal name is specified, anderror is issued. A PIN_NAMES table entry may then be created for theoutput signal. The PIN_NAMES table entry contains the EQUIV_IN/EQUIV_OUTtables index for the current subref entries, the output signal's bitwidth, the index of the HELD table entry created for this signal, thesignal's name internal to the hardware logic module, and two flagsindicating the signal is an output and that there is a HELD table entryfor the signal. If this is the first signal processed for the subrefstructure, the index of the PIN_NAMES table entry is save for insertionin the EQUIV_OUT table entry for the subref.

[0159] After the output signals are processed, the input parameters forthe subref are processed. An EQUIV_IN_PRS and a PIN_NAMES table entryare created for each input. The contents of the EQUIV_IN_PRS entry maybe identical in content to one made for an output parameter with theexception that the flag indicating an output parameter is not set. ThePIN_NAMES table entry contains the same information as a PIN_NAMES tableentry for an output parameter, except a flag indicating an input is setrather than the flag indicating an output parameter.

[0160] The input signals are processed after the input parameters. Foreach input signal, a HELD and a PIN_NAMES table entry are created. Theprocessing of the input signals and the resulting table entries areidentical to that for output signals, except a flag indicating thesignal is an input rather than an output is inserted in the PIN_NAMEStable entries.

[0161] The last PIN_NAMES table entry has now been made for the subref,and the last entry's index is save for insertion into the subref'sEQUIV_OUT table entry.

[0162] Finally the EQUIV_IN and the EQUIV_OUT table entries aregenerated for the subref. The EQUIV_IN table entries contain the indexof the first EQUIV_IN_PRS table entry made processing this subrefstructure. The index of the last EQUIV_IN_PRS table entry made for thissubref, and the name of the data flow graph opcode this subref defines.The EQUIV_OUT table entry contains the latency of the associatedhardware logic module, the name of the hardware logic module, the indexof the first PIN_NAMES table entry associated with the subref, the indexof the last PIN_NAMES table entry associated with the subref.

[0163] Processing of the subref is now complete. info2grf continuesuntil all subrefs structures are processed. If no errors were foundduring processing, the CFG-DFG to HDL converter tables are written tothe output file and a zero status code is returned. Otherwise, no tablesare output and a non-zero status code is returned. The translationprogram may then terminate.

[0164] Converting CFG into Hybrid CFG-DFG

[0165] Embodiments are now described for converting CFG representationsinto hybrid CFG-DFG representations. The original CFG representationsmay include nodes and directed edges, where each node may be a basicblock of code, and each edge may show a transfer of control from theexit of one block to the beginning of another. The code in a basic blockmay have a single point of entrance and a single exit, that is, it mayrepresent a straight sequence of statements that cannot be branched intoor out of other than at the beginning and the end, respectively. Thestatements in a basic block may be sequential.

[0166] The hybrid CFG-DFG representations may have CFG representationsat its upper level, but with dataflow graphs in each code block. In oneembodient, CFG to CFG-DFG conversion may consolidate groups of basicblocks, including groups that form inner loops, into flat and possiblypipelined code blocks.

[0167]FIG. 7 shows an example of a portion of a CFG that correspondingto the following code fragment: If  (a>b)  {    a = a + 1;    b = a * 3;   } else   {    b = a + 3;    a = a* 2;    }

[0168] In this example, the conditional test comparing ‘a’ and ‘b’ maybe stored to a register or temporary variable, and may the laststatement in its basic block. Based on the result of the comparison,control may be transferred to one of two blocks that represent the“true” and “false” parts of the conditional construct. Each of theseblocks, after executing its statements, may transfer control to theblock containing the code that follows the conditional. Note that thecode blocks in a CFG may contain sequential statements, each of whichmay reference registers or variables by reading and writing them. Also,note that the directed edges between blocks may represent a transfer ofcontrol that could be viewed as a one-bit “trigger” signal.

[0169] While CFG representations may be used in many compilers as aninternal intermediate representation, dataflow graphs are not usuallyused because the dataflow execution paradigm is poorly suited toconventional von Neumann processors, due to its use of arbitrarily manyfunctional units and its asynchronous execution. However, the dataflowmodel is well-suited for reconfigurable hardware. In a dataflow graph,the nodes may represent functional units (e.g., integer add). Thedirected edges between nodes may represent data connections that bringoutput data items from one functional unit to the inputs of otherfunctional units. FIG. 4 shows a dataflow graph for the following codefragment: { int d; a = b + c; b = a * 4; d = c − a; a = a * 5 − d }

[0170] The incoming values of ‘b’ and ‘c’ may be loaded at the top ofthe graph. Their values may flow out of the output ports (bottom) of theLOAD nodes. The dataflow graph may expose instruction-level parallelism.Here, three instructions (two multiplies and a subtract) may occur atthe same time. Note that the ‘d’ variable may not need storage since itmay be local to the graph and may exist as an edge. Also note that theintermediate value assigned to ‘a’ may not be stored to that variable,but simply may exists as an edge since a subsequent assignment below maycreate the final value of ‘a’. A dataflow graph such as this may bemapped directly onto reconfigurable hardware by instantiating selectedfunctional units. In this example one add, two subtracts and twomultiplies would be created.

[0171] The sequential statements in each basic block of a CFGrepresentation may be converted to a dataflow graph, thereby producing ahybrid where the upper level nodes are code blocks with single-bitedges, and within each block may be a dataflow graph whose nodes mayfunctional units and whose edges may be data connections. FIG. 8 showsan example of such a conversion applied to the CFG of FIG. 7.

[0172] In an embodiment of the invention, subsets of basic blocks in aCFG representation may be merged into a single dataflow code block whereconditionals may be handled by computing both sides and then selectingthe appropriate values based on the predicate expression of theconditional. FIG. 9 also shows and example of such a code block, wherethe code blocks of FIG. 8 have been merged.

[0173] In addition to scalar and array data types, high-level languagesmay have structures, which are user-specified data types that may becomposites of simpler types. Conventional compiler front ends, whengenerating CFG representations, may deal with these by producing theappropriate address calculations in the basic blocks they produce. Whensuch a structure may be in a local memory, the address calculations maybe left unchanged when converting the graph to a control-dataflow graph.In the case of structures as local variables, the conversion processuses the type information along with the address offsets to determinewhich field of the structure is being referenced.

[0174] Pointers may be dealt with according to the architectural detailsof the target machine. If the reconfigurable hardware “sees” the samememory space as the processor that has passed address parameters to it,pointer arithmetic may work with no modification. If not, an adjustmentfactor is computed at run-time; this factor may be the differencebetween an address in the processor's memory and the place the data wascopied to in the reconfigurable hardware's OBM. The control-dataflowgraphs are generated so that they may include the addition of thisfactor when referencing a pointer.

[0175] Conventional high-level languages may have a small set offixed-size arithmetic data types (e.g., 32-bit integers and 64-bitintegers). This corresponds to the fact that the von Neumann processorsthey target may have fixed-size functional units. In reconfigurablehardware, it may be possible to instantiate functional units of anybit-width, which may achieve a saving of space by using an amount ofprecision needed for a given program. One way this savings may beachieved is to extend the high-level language to include new data typeswith user-specified bit-widths. Another approach may be to allow theuser to specify the bit-width of the standard types (e.g., “Int”) for asection of source code.

[0176] It may possible for the compiler to infer the safety of reducingthe precision of some functional units and the data paths they connectto. For example, in the code:

[0177] unsigned int a, b;

[0178] unsigned char c;

[0179] . . .

c=a+b;

[0180] it may be safe to change the addition operation to an 8-bitadder, since higher bits of the result may be lost when assigning theresult.

[0181] In another embodiment, a component of the translation of CFGrepresentations to control-dataflow graphs may be a database thatdescribes the mapping of operators and function calls to existinghardware logic modules. This database, may be called an “info file”, andmay be used at various steps during compilation.

[0182] Function calls may be dealt with in a variety of ways, dependingon the nature of the routine being called: If the routine is associated,via the “info file”, with a hardware logic module, then a single nodemay be produced in the dataflow graph to represent it as a functionalunit. If the routine meets appropriate criteria, it may be inlined sothat the call mechanism may not be needed. If the function is tailrecursive, it may be converted to a loop. If a function does not fall inthe above categories, then a stack-oriented call mechanism may be used.In another embodiment, LIFO stacks may be implemented in thereconfigurable logic that may hold the various instantiations of localvariables as the recursion takes place. Stack information may alsodirect the flow of control so that the returns of the recursive callstake place correctly.

[0183] The hybrid control-dataflow graph may adapt itself to multiplethreads of execution within a subroutine compiled to reconfigurablehardware. While the semantics of high-level languages may specifysequential execution (where one code block may be active at any giventime), parallelism at the code block level may be easy to implement whenthe compiler can determine that parallel execution may not produceincorrect results. This determination may come in a variety of ways,depending on the language and its possible extensions: For example, ifthe language contains parallel constructs, the parallelism may come inas part of the CFG representation. Also, a sequential language may beextended by user pragmas that may allow the programmer to direct thecompiler to make certain parts of the code parallel. Analysis may allowthe compiler to prove that certain code blocks may be safely executed inparallel.

[0184]FIG. 11 shows an embodiment that has, at left, a sequential partof a CFG representation, and at right a transformed graph where two codeblocks have been made concurrent. The trigger signal from the precedingblock fans out to trigger both concurrent blocks, and a “join” mechanismcalled a LATCH_AND may used to merge the “done” signals from the twoblocks. The LATCH_AND may be designed so that it latches each inputsignal when it goes high, so that the incoming triggers may not have tooccur simultaneously.

[0185] The control-dataflow graph's connectivity information may be usedto improve the performance of logic placement in an FPGA. In currentplace-and-route tools, the placement problem may be viewed at a very lowlevel, where the items being placed may be small logic blocks. If thehardware logic modules available to the compiler are already determinedto be of specified shapes, the compiler may do placement at a muchhigher, hence much simpler, level of granularity, with a potentiallysignificant speedup of the process.

[0186]FIG. 12 shows the top-level process for converting a subroutine'sCFG representation to a hybrid control-dataflow graph. One or more “infofiles” may be read to obtain information about the available hardwarelogic macros that may be available for implementation of the dataflowgraph as reconfigurable logic. After reading the CFG representation intoits internal data structure, the compiler may segregate “external”hardware logic module calls into individual blocks. This may be donebecause external modules interact with resources outside of their codeblocks and race conditions might result if they were to executeconcurrently. Next, individual blocks may be combined into largerblocks, as in the example of FIG. 10.

[0187] Each block may then processed. For non-loop blocks, LOAD nodesmay be created for the various scalar values that are referenced. Thenthe dataflow graph of the block's computation may be created. Finally, aSTORE node may be created for each scalar variable to store its finalvalue. Inner loops may require some additional handling. When the headblock of an inner loop is found, the rest of the loop's blocks may begathered and topologically sorted. Then LOAD and CIRCULATE nodes may bebuilt for the scalars. The loop's code blocks may then be processed in amanner similar to that of non-loop blocks.

[0188] After each DFG is created, delay nodes may be inserted to balancethe path lengths (that may be measured in clock ticks) through thedataflow graph. Then a variety of optimizations may be performed on thegraph. After all DFGs have been created, they may be written to a DFGfile, and a logic emulation file may be created.

[0189] The CFG representation may consist of two parts: an array ofopcodes and a sequence of basic blocks. The opcodes may be read into anarray of structures whose elements consist of one opcode and referencesto the opcode's data sources. Each basic block in the CFG representationmay stored in a structure like the one shown below: typedef struct {  //the following fields are initialized by reading the CFG  int id;  // idof block in the Inizio dump  int label;  // this block's label in theInizio dump  INT_NODE *anchors;  // list of opcode anchors in this block int flags;  // characteristics for this block // the following fieldsare filled in by analyzing the block  int outgoing_true;  // block to goto if test is true  int outgoing_false;  // block to go to if test isfalse  INT_NODE *incoming;  // list of blocks that can jump to this block  INT_NODE *anchor_nodes;   // list of store and branch nodes inthis  block  VAR_INFO *scalars;  // info on all scalars used in thisblock  SCALAR_ASSOC *scalar_sources; // sources of scalars at output of block  int active;  // source of this block's ‘active’  expression  intsrc_true;  // source node of this block's true  expression  intsrc_false;  // source node of this block's false  expression  intis_loop_head;  // tells whether this is a loop head  int is_loop_tail; // tells whether this is a loop tail  int was_flattened;  // tellswhether this is head of a flattened loop  NODEPOOL *pool;  // dataflownodes for this block  } BLOCK_INFO;

[0190] As the dataflow graph is built for a block, its nodes may beallocated in the “pool” field of the basic block structure. An exampleof the dataflow node structure may be show as: typedef struct edge { intnode; int port; struct edge *link; } Edge; typedef struct { intbitwidth; int is_const; char *constval; Edge *back_edges; int pseudoreg;} InputPort; typedef struct { int bitwidth; Edge *targets; intpseudoreg; } OutputPort; typedef struct { char *nodetype; intnum_inputs; InputPort *inputs; int num_outputs; OutputPort *outputs;char *dt_str; char *str; int ili; int mark; } Node;

[0191] In one embodiment, two files may be written as output: A dataflowgraph file and an emulation logic file. The following simple C sourcefunction may be examples of these files: void subr (int a, int b, int*c, int mapno) { if (a > b) *c = a + b; }

[0192] The example code below shows the dataflow graph file that may beproduced when the example C function is compiled: variable_count: 4 “a”integer*4 scalar param “b” integer*4 scalar param “c” integer*4 scalarparam “mapno” integer*4 scalar param BLOCK 0: node_count: 6 #0SRC{circumflex over ( )}INITIATE, input_count 0, output_count 1 O0: 1bits (r0) --> 4.0 3.0 2.0 #1 SRC{circumflex over ( )}ICMP_le,input_count 2, output_count 1 I0: 32 bits (r3) I1: 32 bits (r2) O0: 1bits (r1) --> 5.1 #2 SRC{circumflex over ( )}LD_SCALAR_VAL_DR23_32 “b”,input_count 1, output_count 1 I0: 1 bits (r0) O0: 32 bits (r2) --> 1.1#3 SRC{circumflex over ( )}LD_SCALAR_VAL_DR22_32 “a”, input_count 1,output_count 1 I0: 1 bits (r0) O0: 32 bits (r3) --> 1.0 #4SRC{circumflex over ( )}LATCH_AND_1, input_count 1, output_count 1 I0: 1bits (r0) O0: 1 bits (r4) --> 5.0 #5 SRC{circumflex over ( )}OUTPUT,input_count 2, output_count 0 I0: 1 bits (r4) I1: 1 bits (r1) TRUETO_BLOCK 2 FALSE TO_BLOCK 1 BLOCK 1: node_count: 7 #6 SRC{circumflexover ( )}INITIATE, input_count 0, output_count 1 O0: 1 bits (r5) -->11.0 10.1 9.0 8.0 #7 SRC{circumflex over ( )}IADD, input_count 2,output_count 1 I0: 32 bits (r8) I1: 32 bits (r7) O0: 32 bits (r6) -->10.0 #8 SRC{circumflex over ( )}LD_SCALAR_VAL_DR22_32 “a”, input_count1, output_count 1 I0: 1 bits (r5) O0: 32 bits (r7) --> 7.1 #9SRC{circumflex over ( )}LD_SCALAR_VAL_DR23_32 “b”, input_count 1,output_count 1 I0: 1 bits (r5) O0: 32 bits (r8) --> 7.0 #10SRC{circumflex over ( )}ST_SCALAR_VAL_DR24_32 “c”, input_count 2,output_count 1 I0: 32 bits (r6) I1: 1 bits (r5) O0: 1 bits (r9) --> 11.1#11 SRC{circumflex over ( )}LATCH_AND_2, input_count 2, output_count 1I0: 1 bits (r5) I1: 1 bits (r9) O0: 1 bits (r10) --> 12.0 #12SRC{circumflex over ( )}OUTPUT, input_count 2, output_count 0 I0: 1 bits(r10) I1: 1 bits “0x1” TO_BLOCK 2 BLOCK 2: node_count: 2 #13SRC{circumflex over ( )}INITIATE, input_count 0, output_count 1 O0: 1bits (r11) --> 14.0 #14 SRC{circumflex over ( )}OUTPUT, input_count 2,output_count 0 I0: 1 bits (r11) I1: 1 bits “0x1” EXIT

[0193] The example dataflow graph above has two sections. The first is alist of the parameters and local variables, with name, type and kind(parameter or local). The second section is a listing of code blocks. Inthis example, the code blocks were not merged. Each block has a uniqueid number, and a set of dataflow nodes. Every block has a SRC{circumflexover ( )}INITIATE node and a SRC{circumflex over ( )}OUTPUT node as itsbeginning and ending nodes. For each node there is the followinginformation: its function, its input and output counts, bit-width ofeach input, constant values for those inputs whose input is specified asconstant, bit-width of each output, target list of each output (i.e.,which other node input ports are fed by the output). Input and outputports may also have unique pseudo register ids in parentheses.

[0194] The end of each block may specifie where control flow goes whenthe block is exited. Two target blocks may be specified as TRUE andFALSE targets when the block ends in a conditional. Otherwise one blockmay be specified, or EXIT may specified when the block is the exit ofthe function. FIG. 13 shows this set of code blocks in pictorial form.

[0195] Along with the dataflow graph file, an emulation logic file mayalso written. This may be a simple C routine that may be executed as athread, emulating the reconfigurable logic part of a program. An exampleof an emulation logic file for an example C function may be shown as:#include <sys/types.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <dfl.h> #include<emul_funcs.h> #define a_DF MAP_DR2 #define b_DF MAP_DR3 #define c_DFMAP_DR4 #define mapno_DF MAP_DR5 #define ULOGIC_FR_START MAP_FR2 #defineULOGIC_FR_DONE MAP_FR4 extern MAP_Control_t *DFG_map; int num_new_refs =0; NameFireFunc *new_fire_ref = NULL; NameExecFunc *new_exec_ref = NULL;void tst076_logic_1 (MAP_Control_t *map) {  uint64 src, val;  DFG_map =map;  while (1) { ULOG_WaitOnFRSet (map, ULOGIC_FR_START); ULOG_Write_FR(map, ULOGIC_FR_START, 0); src = ULOG_Read_DR_GRP (map, a_DF,MAP_DR_GRP1); DFG_store_scalar_value (“a”, src); src = ULOG_Read_DR_GRP(map, b_DF, MAP_DR_GRP1); DFG_store_scalar_value (“b”, src); src =ULOG_Read_DR_GRP (map, c_DF, MAP_DR_GRP1); DFG_store_scalar_value (“c”,src); src = ULOG_Read_DR_GRP (map, mapno_DF, MAP_DR_GRP1);DFG_store_scalar_value (“mapno”, src); dfg_simulate (“tst076.dfg”, 0);val = DFG_load_scalar_value (“c”); ULOG_Write_DR_GRP (map, c_DF,MAP_DR_GRP1, val); ULOG_Write_FR (map, ULOGIC_FR_DONE, 1);ULOG_WaitOnFRClear (map, ULOGIC_FR_DONE); }  } void tst076_logic_2(MAP_Control_t *map) {}

[0196] In the example emulation logic file above, an infinite loop mayact as the FPGA. As such, it may obey the same protocols, in thisexample using flag registers FR2 and FR4 as start and end handshakes,respectively. When it receives the start signal from FR2, the emulationroutine may load initial values for the user subroutine's parameters. Itthen may call dfg_simulate, passing in the name of the DFG file to beexecuted. The dataflow simulator may do a token-driven simulation,returning when the EXIT code block has completed. Final values of theparameters may then be returned, followed by a FR4 handshake. Theroutine may then go back to the top of the loop to await another signalthat it should execute.

[0197] Another embodiment of the conversion of a basic block in the CFGto a code block in the DFG is now described. In this embodiment,loads/stores may be treated in two different ways, depending on whetherthey are scalar or array references.

[0198] Scalar references may be converted to DFG edges, with a singleload at the start of the block and a single store at the end. Arrayreferences may be converted to on-board memory (OBM) references.

[0199] Scalar variable references for pass-by-reference parameters maydiffer from local variable references. The CFG output of the compiler'sfront end may reflect this: It may put a level of indirection into suchparameter references. FIG. 14 illustrates the distinction.

[0200] In another example, the following set of operations areconsidered:

a=b+c

c=b−a

a=c*5

[0201] The front end may produce a set of op codes in its CFG output,shown in FIG. 15. Since this was Fortran source, the scalars may bebrought in by reference, so the LDA (Load Address) nodes may perform anindirection step by fetching addresses from the addresses that may beinput to them.

[0202] Note that the graph sharing may not indicate commonsubexpressions. For example, the output of node may go to two places,representing the two reads of variable ‘c’ in the code. Those two readsmay not produce the same value however since there may be an interveningstore in between them.

[0203] In an embodiment, the first step in processing a basic block maybe to build dataflow graph fragments from the op codes. This may be doneby a routine that starts at each anchor (bottom-most) op code andrecursively builds a tree above it. There may be no sharing among thefragments, so the result of this routine may be to build the fragmentsshown in FIG. 16.

[0204] In an embodiment, after the DFG fragments are built, the LDAnodes may be removed from beneath any ACONs (Address Constants) thatcarry scalar pass-by-reference parameters. This reflects the fact thatthe MAP compiler (i.e, the portion of the system that compiles portionsof HLL source code to reconfigurable hardware) may be treating them ascopy-and-restore, rather than by reference. This may leave the DFGfragments looking like those shown in FIG. 17.

[0205] Next a list of all the referenced variables may be made, bystarting at the anchors and looking upward to find ACONs. An INITIATEnode may be created as the head of the DFG, and a layer of LD_SCALARnodes may be created to bring in the initial values of the scalars. Atemporary array of data structures may be created as a reference for thesources of each variable. An example of the structure is shown as:typedef struct { int node; // node that produces the value int port; //port that produces the value char *name; // name of variable }SCALAR_ASSOC;

[0206] The array may be initialized to refer all of the variables totheir LD_SCALAR nodes. Subroutine and function calls may be processedand then the DFG fragments may be converted to a DFG.

[0207] In one embodiment, the CFG-to-DFG conversion may be a routinethat starts at the bottom of each DFG fragment and does the following:Scan upward to find load nodes. For each load, look at the ACON above itto determine which variable is being loaded. Remove the load node andrewire the node it targets so that it is fed by the current source ofthat variable. If the anchor is a store of a scalar, it looks at theright-hand input to see which variable is being stored. It then mayeliminate the store node and record the node's left source as the newsource for that variable.

[0208] In the example, when the first anchor is processed, the LDKRnodes for values ‘b’ and ‘c’ may be found; they may be eliminated andthe nodes they feed may be rewired to be fed from the LD_SCALAR nodes atthe top of the DFG. Then the STKR node may be eliminated and the KADDnode may be noted, in the temporary array, as being the new source ofvariable ‘a’. When the next anchor is processed, its two LDKR nodes maybe found. The ‘b’ value's source may still be its LD_SCALAR node, butthe ‘a’ value's source may be the KADD. The LDKR nodes may be eliminatedand their targets may be wired to the appropriate sources. The STKR nodemay then be eliminated and the KSUB node may be noted as the new sourceof variable ‘c’. When the third anchor is processed, its LDKR may beeliminated and its target may be rewired to the output of the KSUB. Thenthe STKR may be eliminated and the KMUL may be noted as the new sourceof variable ‘a’.

[0209] Once all the anchors are processed, a layer of ST_SCALAR nodesmay be created, storing the final values of the scalars by referencingthe last sources of those variables. The ST_SCALARs have trigger outputsthat may be gathered into a LATCH_AND node, and that node may feed anOUTPUT node at the DFG's bottom Any LD_SCALAR nodes whose outputs areunused may be removed by a dead-code elimination pass. The compiler mayalso looks for ST_SCALAR nodes that are storing the value that's comingfrom that variable's LD_SCALAR node, and may eliminate them since theirvalues have not changed. FIG. 18 illustrates an example of the resultingDFG code block for this example.

[0210] In an embodiment, the DFG generator may distinguish betweenloads/stores of scalar variables versus loads/stores of array elements.When it sees a load or store node (e.g. LDKR or STKR), it may determinethe kind of load/store by looking at its address input. If it seessomething of the form shown in FIG. 14, it may use the ACON node to findthe variable's name, and it may consult an internal ‘variables’ datastructure to find out whether it is a scalar variable.

[0211]FIG. 19 shows an example of what array references may look like.Note that in this example of a hardcoded ‘1’ index, the reference looksstructurally the same as a scalar local variable reference; consultationof the ‘variables’ structure may tell it that this may be an array. Notealso that ACON nodes may have a variable name and a constant offset. Inthe second example in FIG. 19, the offset of 48 comes from the fact thatthe reference is six elements away from the base address, and eachelement is eight bytes in size. The third form is where the address isfed by an expression tree. Here the ACON node for ‘BB’ may be given a −8offset to compensate for the fact that the array's indices start at one.The IMIL node may multiply by 8 because addresses are byte-oriented.

[0212] Load and store nodes for array references may be left in place,though each store node may be given an additional enable input. In thecase of a basic block, this enable input may be fed by the block'sINITIATE node.

[0213] In another embodiment, as the block's CFG is being transformedinto a DFG, an anchor may be a subroutine call rather than a store.Consider the code fragment:

a=b+c

[0214] call xyz (b, a, c)

a=c*5

[0215] The front end output for this code is shown at left in FIG. 20.It may be fed by a linked list of ARGAR nodes, each bringing in oneargument to the call. After the DFG generator has built the DFGfragments from the op codes, the routine may be called that finds thesubroutine call anchors. For each one, it may remove the linked list ofARGAR nodes and gives the call node multiple inputs with the argumentswired to them. This requires knowledge about the subroutine, which maybe drawn from the ‘info’ file. For a stateful node, an extra input maybe created for connection to an enable signal. For an external node, anextra input and an extra output may be given for trigger and donesignals. (Note that by the time this step is being performed, the extraindirection for scalar parameters may have already been removed.)

[0216] The info file may specify, for each argument, whether it is avalue or an address. It also may specify which are inputs and which areoutputs. If an input argument is a value (but not a constant), anappropriate load node may be created. If it's an address, it may be leftunchanged. For this example, assume that this is a 2-input, 1-outputsubroutine. The middle of FIG. 20 shows the DFG code fragment for thesubroutine call after the call has been converted to DFGJSR, and LDKRnodes have been added for the two inputs.

[0217] Later in the subroutine call processing, the DFGJSR node maycause another consultation with the info file. The two inputs may behandled in the same way as with inputs to other nodes: the source of thevariable may be noted, the LDKR node may be removed, and the input maybe wired directly to the source. For outputs, the incoming edge may beremoved, the ACON node may be examined to determine which variable isreceiving the output value, and that output may be noted as the newsource of that variable. At right in FIG. 20 is the complete code blockafter conversion to DFG.

[0218] Calls to intrinsic functions may show up in the CFG output asnon-anchor JSR and QJSR nodes. After the subroutine calls have beenhandled, the JSR and QJSR nodes that remain may be function calls.

[0219] An example of such a function call may be shown as:

a=b+c

c=min (b, a)

a=c*5

[0220] The function call may yield a CFG whose second assignment isshown in FIG. 21. As with subroutine calls, its arguments form a linkedlist. The arguments may be flattened to multiple inputs, as shown in themiddle of the figure. From this point, the building of the DFG may takeplace in the usual way, yielding the graph shown at right of FIG. 21.

[0221] The basic block may end in a conditional branch. In this case,the second input to the OUTPUT node may be fed by the result of acompare. As an example, consider the code:

a=b+c

c=min (b, a)

a=c*5

if (a.gt. 42) a=a+1

[0222] Note that the “a=a+1” statement is not part of the basic block;the block ends with the conditional test. The last anchor is the ICJMPZnode, and the structure above it is shown at left in FIG. 22. The QJSR,the DFRIR and the ICJMPZ nodes get replaced with a KCJMP. Later, theKCJMP may be turned into a KCMP _le. At right is the DFG for the codeblock, where the KCMP _le node may be fed by the final value of ‘a’ andits output goes to the second input of the OUTPUT.

[0223] As was shown in FIGS. 9 and 10, basic blocks may be merged into asingle large code block. This process may include dealing withconditionals inside the code block by computing all paths and selectingthe appropriate values using multiplexers, called SELECTOR nodes. As anexample, consider the code: aa = AL[i]; if (aa > 42) bb = aa + 1; else\\ bb = aa − 1; BL[i] = bb;

[0224] In this example, both expressions aa+1 and aa−1 are computed ineach iteration, and the ‘bb’ value that is assigned to the ‘BL’ array isfed by a SELECTOR. The job of building a merged code block out ofvarious basic blocks may include building the DFG segments for theindividual blocks, and wiring them together using selectors and controlsignals derived from the predicate expressions of the conditionals.

[0225] In an embodiment, the first step in creating a merged code blockmay include topological sorting of the merged basic blocks. This as theblocks are processed, blocks that feed control to a given block may beconverted before that block is converted. In the early steps ofprocessing, each block may be converted to a DFG similar to individualblocks. LD_SCALAR nodes may be built at the top of the DFG. Then thecode blocks may be converted. The differences between a merged codeblock and an individual basic block may include the boolean controlsignals and the selector node hookup.

[0226] In an example, consider an arbitrary block ‘B’ in a set of blocksto be merged, with three blocks able to send control to ‘B’, and ‘B’sending control to one of two blocks when it is done. (Note: there maybe any number of blocks that can send control to a block, but a givenblock sends control to two blocks). FIG. 23, at left, shows this. Assumethat there is a one-bit signal from each of the incoming blocks that ishigh if it is transferring control to block ‘B’. Block ‘B’s activesignal is computed by ORing the incoming signals. Block ‘B’ then maycompute activation signals for the two blocks that it can activate.Since ‘B’ can activate two blocks, it ends with a conditional. Theconditional's predicate is ANDed with the block's activation signal toprovide an activation signal for the “true” signal, and the invertedpredicate is ANDed with the block's activation signal to provide anactivation signal for the “false” signal. FIG. 23, at right, shows thenodes that compute these signals in ‘B’.

[0227] The basic block data structure has fields to store controlinformation that may include: The ‘incoming’ field, which is a linkedlist of all the blocks that have control flow edges into the currentblock. The ‘active’ field, which is the id of the node whose outputrepresents the current block's active signal, i.e. the output of the ORnode sequence. The ‘src_true’ field, which is the id of the node thatcomputes the “true” output control signal. The ‘src_false’ field, whichis the id of the node that computes the “false” output control signal.

[0228] After the control signals have been built, selectors areinstalled for the incoming data values. FIG. 23 shows the selector nodesadded to the example of FIG. 24, for a variable ‘x’. The outputs fromthe OR chain may feed these selectors. A set of selectors may be createdfor each variable in the loop.

[0229] The conversion of an inner loop to a pipelined DFG may build onthe conversion techniques described above. Consider an example of a loopshown as: common /banka/ AL(0:9999) common /bankb/ BL(0:9999) do i =0,n−1 aa = AL(i) call xyz (aa, bb) BL(i) = bb enddo

[0230] The loop is a single basic block, with a conditional branch toitself. FIGS. 25A & 25B shows the code fragments for the anchors. Thefirst one reads ‘AL(i)’ and stores it in ‘aa’. The second once calls thesubroutine ‘xyz’. The third one stores ‘bb’ into ‘BL(i)’. The fourthincrements ‘i’. The fifth decrements ‘.Y0001’. The sixth tests ‘.Y0001’and branches back to this block if it is greater than zero.

[0231] This loop's code block could be transformed using the basic blockapproach. Each time the block was fired, it would do its loads, computeits values, and do its stores. Then it would pass control back to itselfand repeat for the next iteration. While there would be some instructionlevel parallelism in this execution. In another embodiment, array valuesmay be read and written on every clock, taking advantage of pipelinedimplementations of the various functional units.

[0232] To achieve pipelined execution, a loop “generator” may becreated, which will control the loop by firing off iteration atspecified intervals. This node may be called LOOP_DRIVER. It may betriggered by the INITIATE node at the head of the code block, and maybegin to emit a train of pulses. Each pulse may signal the firing of oneiteration of the loop. The LOOP_DRIVER node may not determine when theloop is finished. Other parts of the dataflow graph may test fortermination conditions. An iteration may be fired on every clock tick,or may be slowed down to accommodate loop carried dependencies ormultiple OBM accesses. An input to the LOOP_DRIVER node may specify its“duty cycle” (i.e., how many clock ticks should occur between iterationfirings).

[0233] Loop-carried scalar dependencies may exist, so there may be amechanism to manage these in the pipelined loop. The CIRCULATE node (in32- or 64-bit form) exists to hold the current value of a scalarvariable, and may be connected to the LOOP_DRIVER node's output. Whenthe CIRCULATE sees its first input go high, it knows that the loop isstarting up. It may capture the initial value from its second input, andthereafter proceeds to capture a new value from its third input eachtime the LOOP_DRIVER fires an iteration. This third input is its“circulated” value. In the case where the scalar variable does notchange its value in the loop, the CIRCULATE node's output may beconnected directly to its own third input.

[0234] In an embodiment, loop termination may be determined by aconditional test somewhere in the loop body. Since the loop may bepipelined, by the time the termination condition is detected there maybe some additional iterations already under way. These overflowiterations are not harmful as long as they are prevented from writingvalues to OBM. Thus the termination detection may gate an enable signalto the OBM stores in the loop. It also may trigger a TERMINATION nodethat in turn signals the ST_SCALAR nodes to capture the current valuesof the scalar variables.

[0235]FIG. 26 shows an embodiment of the DFG for the loop of FIGS. 25A &25B. The top layer of LD_SCALAR nodes and the bottom layer of ST_SCALARnodes may be the same as in a simple basic block DFG. The shaded areashows the loop-specific part of the graph. There are CIRCULATE nodes forvariables ‘a1’, ‘b1’, ‘.Y0001’ and ‘i’. The first two of these may bebase addresses that do not change. The last two are down andup-counters, respectively. The LOOP_DRIVER is the loop's controller. Thezero on its second input indicates that it does not need to insert anyclock ticks in between loop iterations. The CIRCULATE nodes watch theLOOP_DRIVER's output signal; each time it indicates a new loopiteration, they capture their circulated input values. Loop terminationmay be detected by the IGT node, which compares the down-counter withzero. When the IGT output goes false, the LOOP_VALID detects this anddisables the LDKR and STKR nodes, and signals the TERMINATION node. TheTERMINATION node in turn triggers the ST_SCALARs so that they capturethe final values from the CIRCULATE nodes.

[0236] In an embodiment, pipelined logic in each functional unit may beactive on every clock tick. Appropriate “matching” may be done for thevalues appearing on the input ports of any given functional unit. FIG.27, at left, shows a DFG fragment that computes the expressionC=A−(A+B)*B, with some assumed latencies next to the nodes. Below it isa chart showing the values of the signals on each clock tick. Because ofthe node latencies, the values appearing at the ports of the multiplyand subtract nodes may not aligned properly. Delay nodes, which arefixed length FIFO queues, may be inserted as shown at right. Theinsertion is done such that, for every node in the DFG, the path lengthsto all of its inputs may be equal.

[0237] After the DFGs are built, a variety of optimizations can beperformed. For example, after the control-dataflow graph code block hasbeen created, some SELECTOR nodes in the graph may have both valueinputs fed from the same source. Such a node can be eliminated since thesame value is being selected regardless of the predicate value feedingit. This situation occurs often when basic blocks have been merged toform one larger code block. FIG. 28 shows part of a code block thatoccurs when the following code fragment has its blocks merged: if (a >b) a = b + c; else b = a − c; X[i] = a * b − c;

[0238] In this example, the right-most SELECTOR's two value inputs arefed by the same source, because ‘c’ has not been assigned in eitherbranch of the conditional. This SELECTOR can be removed.

[0239] In another example, merged code blocks often show opportunitiesfor simplification of boolean expressions. FIG. 28 shows an example. Theoutput of the OR node is the boolean expression ex+ex′, which simplifiesto e. The OR node can be eliminated. More significant opportunities likethis occur when nested conditionals are merged. Also, pipelined loopcode blocks may be fused, feeding the output values from one loopdirectly into another loop.

[0240] The Partitioner

[0241] Referring now to FIG. 29 an embodiment of the partitionercomponent of the invention is shown. In one embodiment, the partitionercomponent may determine where portions of an algorithm will be executed,and therefore the targets of the compilation process. The partitionermay operate on the control-data flow graph internal representation ofthe HLL that defines the algorithm being compiled. The control-data flowgraph taken by the partitioner may be the CFG-DFG produced by the CFG toCFG-DFG converter. The CFG-DFG is the graph of a set of functions thatmay be found in the file being compiled. The decision process results inportions of the code targeted to instructions for the instructionprocessor, and portions of logic in multiple reconfigurable chipscontained in multiple reconfigurable processors.

[0242] The partitioning process may take a single control-data flowgraph as input and produce a set of output control-data flow graphs,each with a specific targeted implementation. The output CFG-DFG may becomposed of partition blocks, which are sub-graphs of the original, andedges which represent the connections between the partitioned code.

[0243] The partitioning decision is based on several factors including:the nature of the input control-data flow graph, the available hardwareresources, and the size and performance characteristics of the hardwareresources, among other factors.

[0244] Many partitioning algorithms can be devised, and alternativealgorithms may be invoked and evaluated in the decision process. Eachsuch partitioning process has as its objective the targeting of hardwareresources according to an optimization strategy. Given an inputcontrol-data flow graph may create a set of connected sub-graphs thatfit within the available resources of the hybrid computing platform,while meeting a set of optimization criteria. The optimization criteriacould for example be, maximizing the use of reconfigurable resources,minimizing the number of reconfigurable chips, minimizing theinterconnection, or maximizing overall performance.

[0245] From the initial control-data flow graph a new graph is createdthat may be composed of partition blocks and edges. Each partition blockcontains a sub-graph of the original control-data flow graph (i.e.,CFG-DFG) and an assignment to a reconfigurable chip or instructionprocessor. Each edge of the new graph may represent a physicalconnection between the assigned resources.

[0246] The task of partitioning then becomes one of creating partitionblocks that meet optimization criteria, size limitations, and can befeasibly connected to the other partition blocks. The followingdescribes one such partitioning approach for achieving an optimumperformance across a hybrid system.

[0247] In one embodiment, the partitioning step may be defined as anassignment of sub-graphs to partition blocks based upon programmersupplied partitioning syntax or directives, such as C pragmas orcompiler directives, that have been passed to the partitioner asannotations in the input control-data flow graph.

[0248] If any of the CFG-DFG sub-graph remains after acting on theprogrammer provided partitioning syntax direction on partitioning, thenthe compiler initiated partitioning may proceed as follows: enumerateall sub-graphs of the remaining CFG-DFG as candidate partition blocks;order the candidate partition blocks in order of potential, usinginformation including: profiling data from instruction processorprofiler, and DFG emulation profiling, performance estimates based onthe degree of parallelism, and performance information found in thehardware logic module information file for each operation of the block,and performance of the data flow between the candidate partition blockand adjoining blocks; compare partition block estimated performance asreconfigurable logic versus instruction processor code; assign candidatepartition block to chip or instruction processor based on comparison;proceed through all candidate blocks; order candidate partition block byestimated performance; and select final candidate block that completelycover the CFG-DFG construct output CFG-DFG containing partition blocks.

[0249] Once this is completed the set of partition blocks may define theexecution locations and the control-data flow graphs that are loadedinto those resources. The partition blocks are passed to a HLLconverter. Blocks intended to run on the instruction processor maycontinue the compilation process into code generation and production ofobject files. The blocks that are targeted for reconfigurable chips, maybe passed to the HLL coverter to generate the MAP Proxy code, and thenpass the CFG-DFG to CGF to CFG-DFG converter to continue the process ofgenerating logic. The partition block eventually continues thecompilation process to CFG-DFG to HDL converter and ultimately to thecreation of a bitstream to be included in a unified executable.

[0250] Preparing for HDL Conversion

[0251] One of the outputs of The CFG to CFG-DFG converter is an ASCIItext file that represents the transformed data flow graph of theprocedure being compiled. The next step in compilation is thetranslation of this file (i.e., a .dfg file) into a format usable by theCFG-DFG to HDL converter verilog code generation phase of compilation.The MAP compiler implements a software module including logicinstructions that translates an ASCII .dfg file into CFG-DFG to HDLconverter internal formatted tables representing the procedure beingcompiled in CFG-DFG to HDL converter “tuple” format. The translatedtables may be written to a binary formatted file (.grf file) which isone of the inputs to the CFG-DFG to HDL converter.

[0252] An embodiment of the translator may have the following steps: Ina first step, the command line may be parsed. The software module hasone non-optional argument, which is the input file name (i.e., the .dfgfile). If the input file argument is specified, then the file name issaved and the file is opened. If the input file cannot be opened,processing terminates.

[0253] The next step in the conversion is the reading and parsing of theinput file. Parsing may be performed by calling routines generated byflex (scanner generator) and bison (parser generation). As the files areparsed, the software module builds internal data structures to representthe data flow graph. The internal data structures used to represent thegraph are the same structures used by The CFG to CFG-DFG converter. Thetwo primary structures are an array of structures representing procedurevariables, and array of structures representing the basic code blockscomprising the executable portion of the procedure being compiled.

[0254] Then, the software module may begin construction of the CFG-DFGto HDL converter tables. In one embodiment, this step is performed afterthe internal structures for the data flow graph have been built. Theoutput file name may constructed from the input file name, e.g., bysubstituting a .grf suffix for the .dfg suffix. The input file name maybe entered into a CFG-DFG to HDL converter FILENAME table, and theoutput file name may be entered into the CFG-DFG to HDL converterOUPTPUT_FILES table.

[0255] Then, the symbol table may be translated to the CFG-DFG to HDLconverter SCALARS table. In one embodiment, this step takes place afterthe CFG-DFG to HDL converter tables are initialized. The formalparameters to the procedure being compiled are by convention the firstentries of the CFG-DFG to HDL converter SCALARS table. A pass is madethru the data flow graph's variables array to extract the formalparameters. For each parameter, a flag may be set in the SCALARS tableindicating it is a formal parameter to the procedure. One of two otherflags may be set in each entry indicating if the parameter is a scalarvariable or an array. The .dfg memory storage size for a scalar or asingle array element is its bit length. This may be converted to bytelength and inserted in the SCALARS table entry for each parameter.Finally the name of the parameter is inserted into the SCALARS tableentry and the entry completed parameter entry is inserted into theSCALARS table.

[0256] When all the formal parameters have been processed, a second passmay be made through the data flow graphs symbol table and the remainingentries for the variables that are not formal parameters to theprocedure may be processed. The processing may be performed as describedfor the formal parameters, except the SCALARS table entries have a localvariable flag set in them instead of a the flag indicating the entry isfor a formal parameter.

[0257] Translation of the data flow graphs basic code blocks followstranslation of the symbol table. A block in the data flow graph is asequential list of nodes. A node is an operation performed on one ormore input operands, with one or more outputs. The operation isrepresented as an ASCII string opcode. The operands are represented asan integer indicating a pseudo register number containing an input oroutput value. Alternately, an input operand may be a constant. Intranslating a data flow graph block, four CFG-DFG to HDL converterverilog generator tables are built. There is a BLOCKS table, which is alist of the code blocks. The RAW_NODES table is a sequential list of thenodes contained in the block. The PRS table is a list of the pseudoregisters defined and the constants and pseudo registers referenced byeach node. The CONSTANTS table contains any constant values used in theprocedure being compiled.

[0258] The translator passes thru the data flow graph's blocks array,processing one block at a time. Each new block gets and entry in theCFG-DFG to HDL converter BLOCKS table. A CFG-DFG to HDL converter BLOCKStable entry contains indices to the first and last CFG-DFG to HDLconverter RAW_NODES table entries for the nodes in the block, which aredescribed below. If the block is an exit block, meaning it is a blockcontaining a return from the procedure being compiled, no additionalinformation is entered into the BLOCKS table entry. If the block is adrop thru block, meaning it does not end with a conditional branch, theindex to the BLOCKS table entry for the successor block is entered intothe current block's BLOCKS table entry. Otherwise, the block must endwith a conditional branch. In this case, the BLOCKS table indices of thetwo possible successor blocks (the branch true block and the branchfalse block) are entered into the current blocks BLOCKS table entry.

[0259] The RAW_NODES table entries are constructed by the translatorpassing thru each node in the block. Processing of a node proceeds asfollows. Each output pseudo register is entered into the PRS table. Asit is an output, and thus defined by the operation of the node, a flagis set in the PRS table entry indicating it is defined by that node. Thepseudo register number is also inserted into the PRS table entry, alongwith the index of the parent nodes RAW_NODES table entry in insertedinto each PRS table entry as well. After the output pseudo registers areprocessed for the node, the inputs are processed. Input pseudo registersare entered into the PRS table in the same manner as the outputs, exceptthe defined flag is not set on their entries. An inputs to a node whichis a constants also gets a PRS table entry. When a constant input isencountered, the CFG-DFG to HDL converter CONSTANTS table is searchedfor an entry that matches the current constant. If a match is found, theindex of the match is used, otherwise a new CONSTANTS table entry ismade and the index of the new entry is used. The PRS table entry for aconstant has the CONSTANTS table entry inserted to it, a flag setindicating this is a constant and not a pseudo register reference entry,and the parent node's RAW_NODES table index inserted into it.

[0260] When all the inputs and outputs for a node are processed, aRAW_NODES table entry is made for the node. The RAW_NODES table entrycontains the opcode of the node, the PRS table indices of the first andlast PRS table entries associated with the node.

[0261] When all the nodes have been translated, the tranlator writes outthe CFG-DFG to HDL converter tables built thru the translation of thedata flow graph to the .grf output file, and processing is complete.

[0262] CFG-DFG into HDL Conversion

[0263] One component of a compilation system for reconfigurable FPGAchips is described. The compilation system has the capability to compilehigher level languages such as C and Fortran into configurationbitstreams for an FPGA that operates within a larger executionframework.

[0264] The larger execution framework is specific to the design of theSRC MAP product. The compilation system is, in theory, readily adaptableto any aribtrary such environment.

[0265] The component described is “CFG-DFG to HDL converter”. Thepurpose of CFG-DFG to HDL converter is to convert the output of “the CFGto CFG-DFG converter” into Verilog language. Verilog is a hardwaredescription language (HDL) that can serve as input to the standardtoolset provided by the manufacturers of FPGA chips.

[0266] The CFG to CFG-DFG converter is another component of thecompilation system. The purpose of The CFG to CFG-DFG converter is toprocess the op-codes of a traditional high level language compiler intoa form more suited for pipelined execution on the MAP/FPGA system.

[0267] The CFG to CFG-DFG converter output essentially consists of adata flow graph (DFG) created from the traditional output of a compiler,which is more of a control flow graph (CFG) form. CFG-DFG to HDLconverter does not require the DFG form to perform its functions. It canalso readily work with CFG stlye input. However, efficient execution inthe MAP/FPGA requires the DFG form.

[0268] The overall compilation strategy is that the Verilog languagecreated by the Traditional Compiler/The CFG to CFG-DFG converter/CFG-DFGto HDL converter combination serves as the guide for how to connectpre-defined “hardware” modules together to acheive an efficientrepresentation on the FPGA/MAP of the user code. Thus, CFG-DFG to HDLconverter does not perform any “synthesis” of op-code constructs intoVerilog language. CFG-DFG to HDL converter simply selects from a knownset of pre-defined hardware modules those modules that match thefunctionality that a specific op-code node requires, and provides theinterconnections between them. The creation, maintenance, and managmentof the pre-defined hardware modules is a major component of the overallcompilation effort, and is not discussed here, except for a discussionof how the relationship between op-code nodes and pre-defined hardwaremodules is managed.

[0269] While performing its tasks, CFG-DFG to HDL converter manages aset of internal tables that represent various pieces of informationrequired for the processing. Eventually, the tables have enoughinformation such that the Verilog representaion of the user code can beoutput. Input files for CFG-DFG to HDL converter consist of a simplefile format, which contains some information already pre-processed intoCFG-DFG to HDL converter table format.

[0270] Note that CFG-DFG to HDL converter only has a single tableformat. Table management is simplified by only allowing the addition,and not deletion, of table entries. Entries can be marked invalid withflags, and simply not copied to further stages of table development.Table entries are also of fixed sized, making table searches rapid.

[0271] CFG-DFG to HDL converter inputs consist of command-line switches,and two types of input files. Command line switches are used to specifythe names of input files, and to control precise details of CFG-DFG toHDL converter processing. For the purpose of this document, the detailsof CFG-DFG to HDL converter processing controlled by these switches areunimportant. Hence, the only substantive inputs are the two types ofinput files as discussed here.

[0272] An input op-codefile is specified with the “-f” switch. Only oneop-code file may be input. This file consists of the data flow graphoutput of the CFG to CFG-DFG converter converted to CFG-DFG to HDLconverter file format by the translator utility called “dfg2grf”described above.

[0273] Op-code nodes: An op-code node consists of the name of the node,and lists of input and output psuedo registers. A psuedo register issimply a number, and is used to correlate the flow of data betweennodes.

[0274] Block information. Indicates how the opcodes are divided intobasic blocks. A basic block has the same definition as in a traditionalcompiler, i.e.: a sequence of instructions with a single entry point anda single exit point.

[0275] Constants information. An op-code node may reference a constantvalue as an input, instead of a psuedo register.

[0276] “Scalars” Information. Information about arguments passed to thecompiled subroutine function.

[0277] Filename information. Used to generate the output filename of thegenerated Verilog file.

[0278] Any number of “CFG-DFG to HDL converter info” files may be inputby use of the “-a” switch. A “CFG-DFG to HDL converter info” fileconsists of “info” file information converted to CFG-DFG to HDLconverter file/table format by the “info2grf” utility. The input to“info2grf” consists of an ascii text “info” file, and is intended to beedited and maintained by developers/users.

[0279] The “info” file is the mechanism by which CFG-DFG to HDLconverter makes the association between the op-code node names, and theresulting module names that are output in the Verilog language file. Itcan also be used to input information about a user-definedop-code/module relationship.

[0280] Information contained in the input CFG-DFG to HDL converterhardware logic module information file: “info” files contain allinformation about modules used by the compilation system as a whole.Only the information used by CFG-DFG to HDL converter is mentioned here.The information used by CFG-DFG to HDL converter is:

[0281] Name of the op-code node. Name of the module that corresponds tothe op-code node. Latency in clocks of the time betwen inputs andcorresponding outputs. A list of inputs, their bit-widths, and theirnames, in order as the psuedo registers appear in the op-code node inthe The CFG to CFG-DFG converter-output flow graph. A list of outputs,their bit-widths, and their names, in order as the psuedo registersappear in the op-code node in the The CFG to CFG-DFG converter-outputflow graph. Names, bit-widths, and the external signal names to whichthey connect, of any hardware-related module I/O connections that arerequired for execution, but do not appear in the flow graph. (This wouldinclude, for example, a CLOCK signal, or enable/reset signals that maybe implicit in the context of a given node's residence in a block).

[0282] CFG-DFG to HDL converter outputs: CFG-DFG to HDL converter outputconsists of a Verilog language file, which is ascii text. The filenameis generated from information carried in the op-code input file. Ingeneral, the filename is the “basename” of the high level language file,suffixed with “.v”. For example, a high level language file named“toto.c” results in a Verilog language file named “toto.v”.

[0283] The Verilog language file has three “include” statementsreferencing “PREAMBLE.v”, “AMBLE.v”, and “POSTAMBLE.v” “OBM_DR_SET.v”and “FR_SET.v”. These three include statements bracket and divide thedeclaritive and instantitive sections of the generated Verilog code.They allow the generated Verilog code to be used without modification ina variety of execution and simulation environments, by providingdifferent files to resolve the includes.

[0284] CFG-DFG to HDL converter Processing Flow: Initilization:Initialization processing of CFG-DFG to HDL converter consists ofvalidating the command line switches, and reading the input files. Thedata within the input files is read directly into internal CFG-DFG toHDL converter tables.

[0285] One of the primary functions is the creation of many internaltables that contain information to be used throught CFG-DFG to HDLconverter processing. The two most primary tables that are created arethe EQUIV_IN and EQUIV_OUT tables. These tables contain the essence ofthe information contained in the “info” files. The entries in these twotables have a one-to-one correspondence, and direct CFG-DFG to HDLconverter to convert a given named op-code node in the input flow graphto a given instantiation of a pre-defined hardware module in the outputVerilog file. A MODULES table is also created, which has the details ofthe module connections for the modules indexed by EQUIV_OUT.

[0286] Various tables for special purpose processing are also created atinitialization. This allows information for target hardware specificprocessing to be contained in one area of the source code. All specialpurpose processing specific for the target hardware environment can becontrolled, for example, by the various flags and table settingsgenerated in this initialization phase. It is thus possible to re-targetCFG-DFG to HDL converter processing for another platform by first,adding such functionality as required elsewhere, and then selecting theinitilization processing that would occur to enable this. In theorydifferent execution environments could be supported through the simpleuse of command-line switches.

[0287] Such special case target hardware specific processing includessupport for: Lists of global signals that the non-psuedoregister-related connections of modules will connect to. Informationregarding the memory banks and how memory related op-code nodes will beconnected. Information regarding the “MIRROR” modules, which are the SRCmechanism for connecting parameters input to the compiled subroutine tothe FPGA instantiated design, and potentially returning an updatedvalue. Connections to “code_block_reset” will actually be connected tothe “block_reset” signal of the current block of residence for a givenmodule.

[0288] Process raw input to the internal tables: The input table ofop-code flow graph nodes is read into the NODE table, and the names ofthe op-code nodes are searched for in the EQUIV_IN table. When found,the corresponding EQUIV_OUT table entry gives the MODULE index of thepredefined hardware module. An index to this module information isplaced in the NODE table.

[0289] Verify consistency of bit widths between op-code nodes: Now, allop-code nodes in the NODES table have an assigned hardware module. Allthe psuedo registers are now examined, to verify that there isconsistent bit-width matching for psuedo registers marking the output ofone module going to the input of another module. While this work isperformed, a table containing psuedo register information is built.

[0290] Note that CFG-DFG to HDL converter has no information about, orneed for, the “type” of the data that flows between modules. Only thebit-width is important.

[0291] Mark certain shift functions for “inlining”: The NODES table isexamined, and certain modules that represent a “shift” operation areprocesssed. The name convention of the module indicates whether theshift is by a constant amount, and by how much. If the module is such ashift, this fact, and the direction of the shift, is marked in the NODEStable entry with flags. The shift count for the module is also extractedand placed in a field of the NODES table entry. This information will beused during output of the generated Verilog code to “inline”, orrepresent directly with Verilog code syntax, the functionality of themodule without actually instantiating the module.

[0292] Analyze op-code node dependency: The NODES table and associatedpsuedo registers are now examined to create a table of node dependecies(NODE_DEPS). The NODE_DEPS table indicates which op-code nodes in theNODES table are pre-requisites of (i.e. have data flowing directly to,via a psuedo register) other op-code nodes.

[0293] Op-code nodes are issued as follows: The NODE_DEPS table isexamined, and a total count of number of predecessors for a given NODEentry is created and stored in the NODE table entry. A “clock counter”in every NODE table entry is zeroed. A table is created (PICT_NODES)that has a list of every NODE entry that has a predecessor count ofzero.

[0294] Issue op-code nodes as follows: Placement of a NODES tableentry's index in the PICT_NODES table is the basic indication that anop-code node has been “issued”. When the PICT_NODE entry is made, anentry is also made in a table listing the specific instance of themodule. (INSTANCES table) Since there might be many instances of thesame module type, it is through the INSTANCES table that unique namesare generated for each instance of a given module type.

[0295] After an initilization phase as described above, the process ofissuance of op-code nodes continues as follows: For all new entries inthe PICT_NODES table, examine the NODE_DEPS table and decrement thepredecessor count in those NODE table entries who have the issuedop-code node as a predecessor. Adjust the clock count of each affectedNODE table entry by the latency of the module who was the predecessor.Create an associated INSTANCES table entry for each node newly added tothe PICT_NODES table.

[0296] Perform “wiring” of outputs of predecessor INSTANCES tableentries to the newly created INSTANCES table entries by building upinformation in the WIRING table. The WIRING table has informationregarding source and destination INSTANCES table index, and theargument, or parameter, number.

[0297] Now examine the NODES table for op-code nodes whose predecessorcount has newly gone to zero. add these entries to the PICT_NODES table,and continue as above. Continue this process until all op-code nodeshave been issued.

[0298] Output HDL file: Processing has now developed to the point wherethe output of the HDL file can commence. There is still some processingthat occurs during this process including emitting declaritivestatements for all “wire” connections and wiring to connect the basicblocks to each other.

[0299] For all entries in INSTANCES table, first check to see if it hasbeen “inlined”. If so, output appropriate HDL syntax. If not, outputinstance declaration of the appropriate module, and the connections ofthe module's I/O pins to the various wires etc. as described in theWIRING table.

[0300] Bitstream Configuration

[0301] A component of the compiling system that does the inclusion ofthe bitstream file created from the Xilinx tools into a compilable Ccode that will ultimately be integrated into the user's executable. Thiscomponent takes as input 1 or 2 FPGA bitstream files which are in abinary files containing programming data only. The result of thiscompilation phase is a C code that contains two structures, one for eachfpga bitstream. Each structure contains the packed representation of theFPGA bitstream contained in an array, described below; a pointer to theinternal location for the bitstream; the number of the FPGA thisbitstream represents, the length of the bitstream array; the address ofthe beginning of the bitstream array; and, a pointer to the C version ofthe MAP routine used for emulation.

[0302] The FPGA bitstream files are read into a buffer as 4096 bytequantities. This buffer is then packed into 64-bit words and written outto the bitstream array contained in the appropriate bitstream'sstructure. The last quantity read from the bitstream file is padded outto be complete 64-bit words and those words are also written out to thearray. After completing the entire bitstream file, a check is done todetermine if the last word is the last word of the cache line. If not,more padding is done to ensure that the last array words completely fillout the 4 word cache line on the micro-processor system.

[0303] After completing the translation of the bitstream file, theremaining information and pointers are inserted into the structure thatrepresents the first FPGA bitstream. The same process is done again toread in and translate the second FPGA bitstream. Either one of thesebitstreams may be present, or neither may be present for thiscompilation phase. The bitstream configurator handles all cases of nullor present fpga bitstream files and build the appropriate datastructures to reflect that.

[0304] Integration into a Unified Executable

[0305] As a result of creating object files that will be executed ondifferent and therefore non-homogeneous platforms, the next step in thecompilation process must bring these various components together tobuild what will be referred to as a “unified executable”. A unifiedexecutable, then, contains both the machine code that will execute onthe instruction processor as well as the machine code that will executeon the hardware logic processor.

[0306] Since the unified executable resides in the address space of theinstruction processor during its execution, the format of the unifiedexecutable must be compatible with the application interface accepted bythe instruction processor. In order to allow fpga bitstreams to existwithin the unified executable, a method was developed to encapsulate thebitstream data into an acceptable format.

[0307] Once bitstreams have been generated by the compilation process,they are read into C structures, with one C structure created for eachbitstream being accessed in this program. These C structures are uniqueto each bitstream, as they have been named to match the internal namecreated during the control flow information file generation phase.Tagging the separate control flow information files with unique namesallows the resultant bitstream to also have a unique identifier whenbuilt into a C structure. If the bitstream configuration is meant to beused in another compilation process, the C structure could be saved atthis point as a binary file.

[0308] Bitstream C structures can either reside in the unifiedexecutable or on the microprocessor at a location that has been madeavailable during execution. By default, the bitstreams created duringthe compilation process are embedded in the unified execution andtherefore are in the address space at execution time. If there are manybitstream structures being configured for a particular executable, thenit is possible to embed only some or none of the bitstream C structuresin the unified executable. If not all of the bitstream structures residein the executable's address space at execution time, then the run-timeenvironment will need to read in the appropriate bitstream structures atthe point where the hardware logic configuration for that bitstream isinvoked.

[0309] After deciding whether to include the bitstream C structures inthe unified executable, the available standard linker on themicrorocessor can be used to create it from the object files. Since allthe object files are of the appropriate binary interface, nothingspecial must be done to accommodate including both micro processormachine code and hardware logic machine code.

[0310] As shown in the following diagram, the bitstreams representingthe hardware logic configuration to be run at execution time may existin one of two locations shown in FIG. 30.

[0311] Runtime Environment

[0312] The run-time environment in which the unified binary executes maybe extended beyond the run-time environment in which a instructionprocessor binary executes. The MAP library may include support routinesfor emulation and simulation of a dataflow graph. From a user view,there are three categories of routines in the run-time environment:memory management, MAP resource management, and MAP execution.

[0313] Memory Management: Hardware limitations may require blocks ofmemory transferred between the instruction processor environment and thereconfigurable processor environment to start on cache boundaries. Twofunctions are provided to aid in cache alignment in the event suchhardware limitations are present.

[0314] The first function, addr32 (or, alternately IADDR32 for Fortran),is a software module including logic instructions for accepting anarbitrary memory address and returning the address of the first cachealigned word of memory which is equal to or greater than the inputaddress argument. An array that is to be aligned may be declared withpadding at the beginning and end of the array that approximates thememory of a cache line. A pointer may be declared to point to the cachealigned array. The padded array may be passed as an argument to addr32,and the pointer may be set to the result of the function. References tothe aligned array may be made thru the pointer.

[0315] The second function, Cache Aligned Allocate (AlternativelyCACHE_ALIGNED_ALLOCATE for Fortran) is software module that includeslogic instructions for receiving a single integer argument andgenerating a pointer to the allocated space which begins on a cachealigned boundary. The argument may be the size of the memory allocationrequest in bytes. This function may be used to declare a pointer. Inaddition, users may call this function to allocate the required spacefor an array, and set the pointer to the result of the function.References to the array may be made thru the pointer.

[0316] MAP resource management: It is possible to dynamically modify therun-time environment by adding and deleting reconfigurable hardwareresources to the job. While executing on the instruction processor, noMAP resources are needed. Prior to executing a MAP procedure,reconfigurable hardware resources must be allocated to the job. Thiscould occur at job start-up time, or anytime prior to MAP execution.After execution of the MAP procedure, execution of the unified binarymay not require MAP resources for some time, so it may be desirable torelease one or more MAP processors until they are again needed.Similarly, it may be necessary to add additional map resources prior toexecuting another MAP procedure. Two functions are provided to manageMAP resources.

[0317] The first function, map_allocate (MAP_ALLOCATE (N, STAT) forFortran) is a software module that receives a single input argument thatindicates the number of MAP resources to be allocated. A zero resultvalue (STAT for Fortran) indicates successful allocation. A non-zeroresult (STAT) indicates the request was not successfully satisfied.

[0318] The second function, map_free (MAP_FREE (N, STAT) for Fortran) isa software module that has a single input argument indicating the numberof MAP resources to release from the job. A zero return value (STAT forFortran) indicates the resources were successfully freed from the job. Anon-zero return value (STAT) indicates an error was encountered intrying to release the resources.

[0319] MAP resources are identified by a MAP id number. The first MAPallocated to a job has a MAP id of 0. If n resources are allocated to ajob at any time, they are identified as 0, 1, . . . n−1. MAP resourceswith the largest valued MAP id numbers are deallocated first. Forexample, if seven MAP resources are allocated to a job, they areidentified by the integers 0 thru 6. If three are deallocated, MAP ids 0thru 3 remain allocated to the job. If two are then allocated, the mostrecently allocated MAP ids are 4 and 5.

[0320] MAP execution: The details of configuring the reconfigurablehardware with the logic bitstreams, and the details of transfer ofcontrol to the reconfigurable hardware and back to the instructionprocessor hidden from the user in the runtime environment. The MAP proxycode generated by the HLL converter performs these tasks. The routineMAP_Execute called by the proxy code is discussed here.

[0321] MAP_Execute and its various run-time entry points perform thefollowing functions. First, the MAP proxy code has indicated which MAPresources are to be used for execution of the MAP procedure. MAP_Executelocks the resources to prevent other threads of execution (or user jobs)from accessing the resources while the MAP procedure is executing. Itchecks to see if the resources to be used are correctly configured withthe user logic for the MAP procedure to be executed. If not, it locatesthe appropriate logic bit streams and configures the MAP resources.Execution on the reconfigurable hardware is initiated. MAP_Execute waitsfor execution to complete, unlocks the resources, and then signalscompletion to, or transfers control back to the instruction processor.

[0322] Emulation in the Runtime Environment

[0323] Emulation is a very useful debugging tool as well as a tool thatallows performance profiling at the data flow graph level. Emulationcapability is built into the run time environment of executables builtby the MAP compiling system.

[0324] The run-time libraries support three distinct environments: 1)execution with MAP hardware, 2) execution with emulated MAP and dataflowgraph emulation, 3) execution with emulated MAP, and simulated userlogic. The selection of the particular environment is done at run-timebased on environment variable settings:

MAPHW=MAPIII—indicates executing with MAP hardware

MAPHW=EMUIII—indicates executing with the MAP emulator

[0325] If emulation mode is being used, an additional environmentvariable determines how the logic for the MAP is handled:

ULOGIC_TYPE=EMU—indicates that data flow graph emulation is to be used

ULOGIC_TYPE=SIM—indicates that user logic will run in a VerilogSimulator

[0326] When MAPHW=EMUIII is set, the run-time library routines thatmanage the MAP call MAP emulation routines instead of the MAP hardwaresupport routines. Every executable is capable of running on eitherhardware or in emulation. The MAP Emulator takes the place of the MAPcontrol processor and its resources: the communication link, the OnboardMemory, Data Registers, and Flag Registers, providing software emulationversions of these resources. FIGS. 31 and 32 show the structure of theMAP emulator.

[0327] The MAP Emulator executes as pthreads separate from theinstruction processor application code and processes. The emulatorthreads are started when the run-time routines detect that emulationmode is selected rather than MAP hardware mode. Just as the MAP hardwareruns asynchronous to the instruction processor, the emulator also runasynchronously.

[0328] The function of the MAP emulator is to emulate the communicationand control link to the instruction processor based application, and toprovide interfaces to the User Logic running in Data Flow Emulation oras Verilog Simulation.

[0329] Data Flow emulation runs also as a separate pthread interfacingto the MAP emulator through the interface routines used to read or writeFlag registers, Data Registers, and On-Board Memory.

[0330] If the user logic generated by the MAP compiler has been createdas Verilog, a Verilog simulator can be used to execute the user logictogether with the MAP emulator. The Verilog simulation is run as aseparate executable that communicates with the MAP emulator through ashared memory segment. In this case the simulator provides the Onboardmemory, Data registers and Flag Registers, while the MAP emulatorprovides the MAP control processor.

[0331]FIG. 31 shows the MAP emulator together with DFG emulation, andFIG. 32 shows the MAP emulator with a Verilog Simulator.

[0332] In another embodiment, dataflow graph emulation may be conductedas follows: The CFG to CFG-DFG converter step of the MAP compilercreates two files: a dataflow graph (in text form) of the user'ssubroutine, and an emulation logic file. The dataflow graph file may bedual purpose: It may be used by the CFG-DFG to HDL converter to producea Verilog translation of the subroutine, and it also may be read in bythe emulation logic routine when emulation is being used to validate thesource code or to collect performance data.

[0333] In an embodiment, a dataflow graph may include nodes and directededges, where nodes may be functional units and edges are dataconnections that carry output values from one node to inputs of othernodes. It may be possible to run a dataflow simulator using the dataflowgraph. Simulation can be useful to: 1) validate both the source code andits translation to dataflow form, 2) print trace information fordebugging and, 3) gather performance estimations, among other functions.

[0334] In an embodiment Dataflow simulation may take place in a tokendriven simulation mode that may be a loosely coupled, asynchronoussimulation where sequencing may be valid but time is not taken intoaccount. In this mode, there is no notion of things happening“simultaneously”. Any node can be executed at any time, as long as thereare values available on its inputs. The data values are called “tokens”,and tokens can queue at the input ports of the nodes. In anotherembodiment, a clock accurate simulation takes into account the systemclock and the execution latencies of the functional units. Here the word“simultaneous” has meaning.

[0335]FIG. 33 shows a flow chart of an embodiment of a token drivendataflow simulator. In one example of an embodiment, the routine“dfg_simulate” may be called from the emulation logic file to start thesimulator. In this example, the simulator may start by reading the DFGfile and building an internal representation. Then it begins thesimulation, starting with block zero (by definition, the entranceblock). Each time it simulates a code block, it first clears the queuesand node states, then triggers the block's execution by sending a singletoken to the INITIATE node at the top of the block. It then loops,looking for nodes that can fire. In this example, the “firing rule” formost nodes is that the node can fire if there is a token available onevery one of its inputs. “Firing” consists of taking a token from eachinput queue, and using these values to perform the node's particularfunction. That function produces one or more output values, which aresent out as tokens on the node's outputs. When an output fans out tomultiple nodes, a value token may be delivered to each of the queues ofthe target nodes.

[0336]FIG. 34 shows an example of a DFG fragment according to anembodiment, where the fragment is stepped through each iteration of thesimulator's inner loop. Three values are waiting on the input queues atthe start. The top two nodes are marked as able to fire. They consume atoken from each queue, and send result tokens to the queues of the nodesfed by their outputs. Note that at t=1, the bottom node has a value onits right input, but none on its left input, so it cannot fire. At t=2there are two tokens in the queue of the right input of the bottom node.After five passes of the simulator's inner loop, this fragment has nomore values that can be processed.

[0337] There are, in general, many correct firing orders for a dataflowgraph. It would have been equally valid, in the above example, to havefired the upper nodes three times before firing any of the other nodes.The fact that tokens arrive in queues in order, ensures thatcorresponding values on the inputs of each node will “match up”correctly. The node input queues in the simulator are designed to expandas needed: any time a value is sent to a queue and the queue is full,the queue size is increased to accommodate the new value. The processingorder shown in the flow chart, where in each sweep across the nodes anode will fire only once even if it had more values it could haveprocessed, may be chosen so as to minimize the necessary queue lengths.

[0338] Various node firing orders that may occur during asynchronousdataflow simulation produce equivalent results when the dataflow nodesare “pure functional”, that is, when each node's output tokens(s) maydepend on the input tokens that have been fetched to compute theoutputs. Not all nodes may be pure functional. Some nodes may have“state”, i.e. they have some memory of what they have done previously.These nodes may be called “stateful”. Some nodes may interact with thesurrounding hardware, i.e. they read or write to flag registers, dataregisters or on-board memory. The dataflow simulator may execute thesenodes by making calls to the appropriate MAP emulator functions.

[0339] In another embodiment, dataflow simulation may take place in amode that more closely mimics what happens on reconfigurable hardware.Clock-accurate simulation assumes the existence of a system clock, andthe functional units execute synchronously, coordinated by the clock. Inthe hardware, every functional unit may perform an operation in everyclock cycle, regardless of whether there are valid data on its inputs.The dataflow graphs, and the logic circuits that are produced from thegraphs, may be produced in such a way that “junk” data from thefunctional units is ignored.

[0340] Clock-accurate simulation may be very wasteful of compute time ifit operates in a mode where each node of the graph computes in everyclock cycle. In an embodiment, it is possible to simulate in a modewhere valid computations are performed by the dataflow nodes, as intoken-driven simulation, and the synchronous aspect of the system iscaptured by attaching “time stamps” to the tokens. The simulation queuesup tokens on the inputs, and the node firings and executions may matchup values on the queues by their time stamps.

[0341] Though clock-accurate simulation may be more complex thanasynchronous token-driven simulation, they may more closely reflect theoperations and synchronization that occur on reconfigurable hardware.Thus a clock-accurate simulation has the following advantages: 1)Incorrectly-placed delay nodes will produce error indications in aclock-accurate simulation, whereas they will appear to execute correctlyin an asynchronous simulation. 2) Clock-accurate simulation can giveaccurate execution time predictions, since it simulates the systemclock. 3) When reads and writes to the same memory bank occur in anasynchronous simulation, the order in which they occur may beunspecified and therefore they may not occur in the same order as theywould occur on the reconfigurable hardware. But clock-accuratesimulation may produce an execution order that is guaranteed to matchwhat happens on the hardware.

[0342] In another embodiment, issues related to the simulation ofdataflow graphs produced by the MAP compiler are addressed, including:

[0343] Stateful node issues: A stateful node has one or more internalfields in its node structure that it uses to keep track of some aspectof what has occurred in the past. One example of a stateful node is anaccumulator that sums up the values of the token stream on its input. Anaccumulator node needs a place in its node structure to hold the currentvalue of the accumulating sum. Other node types may require more complexstate. The dataflow node structure has the field of type “NodeState”,which is defined by the struct: typedef struct { int initialized; void*state; } NodeState;

[0344] In an embodiment, whenever a code block is entered, the“initialized” fields of its stateful nodes are set to “false”. The nodeexecution routine for stateful nodes will check this field, and if it isfalse they may perform an initialization, typically by allocating a datastructure appropriate for the state of the node type, and setting the“state” pointer to point to it. The fields of that structure are alsoset to an appropriate initial state. The “initialized” field is then setto “true” so that subsequent firings of the node will not attempt toreinitialize.

[0345] Firing and Execution Rules: In an embodiment, each node type in adataflow graph has two functions associated with it: a “firing rule” andan “execution rule”. The firing rule for most nodes may be simple: anode can fire when there may be a data value on every one if its inputs.There may be a few exceptions to this in the case of loop control nodesthat manage the pipelined behavior of a loop dataflow graph. Theexecution rule for a node is the specification of how it uses its inputvalues to create its output values, i.e. the execution rule may be thenode's function. When the simulator reads the dataflow graph file andbuilds the internal node structures, each node has two function pointersthat may be used to point to the firing and execution functions for thatnode.

[0346] User Macros: In an embodiment, the MAP compiler allows users toreference their own hardware logic units when compiling codes toreconfigurable hardware. In order to do dataflow simulation of acompiled code, the user supplies an execution function for each unitbeing referenced. This is the “execution rule” for the node. For usermacros, it is assumed that it will obey the “normal” firing rule, i.e.,that the node can fire when there is a value on every input. Thedataflow simulation routines for user macros are read in from the “info”file and are then handled internally in the same way that the SRCbuilt-in macros are handled: the user's simulation function may becompiled and the associated dataflow nodes are given pointers to thefunction.

[0347] Although the invention has been described and illustrated with acertain degree of particularity, it is understood that the presentdisclosure has been made only by way of example, and that numerouschanges in the combination and arrangement of parts can be resorted toby those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scopeof the invention, as hereinafter claimed.

[0348] The words “comprise,” “comprising,” “include,” “including,” and“includes” when used in this specification and in the following claimsare intended to specify the presence of stated features, integers,components, or steps, but they do not preclude the presence or additionof one or more other features, integers, components, steps, or groups.

We claim:
 1. A method of converting high-level language source code intoa unified executable comprising: generating an object file from areconfigurable hardware portion of the high-level language source code;and integrating the object file into the unified executable.
 2. Themethod of claim 1, wherein said method comprises converting thehigh-level language source code into a control flow graphrepresentation.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein said method comprisesconverting the control flow graph representation into a control-dataflow graph representation.
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein said methodcomprises partitioning the control-flow data graph into a instructionprocessor portion and the reconfigurable hardware portion.
 5. The methodof claim 1, wherein said method comprises converting the reconfigurablehardware portion into a hardware definition language file;
 6. The methodof claim 5, wherein said method comprises converting the hardwaredefinition language file into a reconfigurable hardware bitstream file.7. The method of claim 6, wherein said method comprises converting thereconfigurable hardware bitstream file into the object file.
 8. A methodof forming a unified executable comprising: converting a high levellanguage source code into a control flow graph representation;converting the control flow graph representation into a control-dataflow graph representation; partitioning the control-data flow graph intoa instruction processor portion and a reconfigurable hardware portion;converting the reconfigurable hardware portion of the control-data flowgraph into a hardware definition language portion and the instructionprocessor portion into a instruction processor object file; convertingthe hardware definition language portion into a reconfigurable hardwarebitstream; converting the reconfigurable hardware bitstream into abitstream object file that is readable by a instruction processor; andintegrating the bitstream object file with the instruction processorobject file to form the unified executable.
 9. A system for forming aunified executable comprising: a partitioner to partitioncontrol-dataflow graph data into a reconfigurable hardware portion and ainstruction processor portion.
 10. The system of claim 9, wherein saidsystem comprises a high-level language converter to convert a high-levellanguage into control flow graph representations.
 11. The system ofclaim 10, wherein said system comprises a control flow graph tocontrol-dataflow graph converter to convert the control flow graphrepresentations into the control-dataflow graph data.
 12. The system ofclaim 9, wherein said system comprises a control-dataflow graph tohardware definition language converter to convert the reconfigurablehardware portion of the control-dataflow graph data to a hardwaredefinition language file.
 13. The system of claim 12, wherein saidsystem comprises a hardware definition language to bitstream converterto convert the hardware definition language file to a bitstream file.14. The system of claim 13, wherein said system comprises a bitstream toobject file converter to convert the bitstream file into a bitstreamobject file.
 15. The system of claim 14, wherein said system comprises alinker to integrate the bitstream object file into the unifiedexecutable.
 16. The system of claim 9, wherein said system comprises asupport hardware logic module.
 17. The system of claim 9, wherein saidsystem comprises a user hardware logic module.
 18. The system of claim9, wherein said system comprises a run time library.
 19. The system ofclaim 9, wherein said system comprises a hybrid computer comprising ainstruction processor and reconfigurable hardware.
 20. The system ofclaim 19, wherein said reconfigurable hardware comprises amulti-adaptive processor (MAP).
 21. A system for forming a unifiedexecutable that is executable on a hybrid reconfigurablehardware-instruction processor computer, said system comprising: ahigh-level language converter to convert a high-level language intocontrol flow graph representations; a control flow graph tocontrol-dataflow graph converter to convert the control flow graphrepresentations into control-dataflow graph representations; apartitioner to partition the control-dataflow graph representations intoa reconfigurable hardware portion and a instruction processor portion; acontrol-dataflow graph to hardware definition language converter toconvert the reconfigurable hardware portion of the control-dataflowgraph representations to a hardware definition language file; a hardwaredefinition language to bitstream converter to convert the hardwaredefinition language file to a bitstream file; a bitstream to object fileconverter to convert the bitstream file into a bitstream object file;and a linker to integrate the bitstream object file into the unifiedexecutable.
 22. A computer program product comprising: a computer usablemedium having computer readable program code embodied therein forcausing a formation of a unified executable, the computer readableprogram code comprising: computer readable program code for causing acomputer to convert a high level language source code into a controlflow graph representation; computer readable program code for causingthe computer to convert the control flow graph into a control-data flowgraph; computer readable program code for causing the computer topartition the control-data flow graph into a instruction processorportion and a reconfigurable hardware portion; computer readable programcode for causing the computer to convert the reconfigurable hardwareportion of the control-data flow graph into a hardware definitionlanguage portion and the instruction processor portion into ainstruction processor object file; computer readable program code forcausing the computer to convert the hardware definition language portioninto a reconfigurable hardware bitstream; computer readable program codefor causing the computer to convert the reconfigurable hardwarebitstream into a bitstream object file that is readable by a instructionprocessor; and computer readable program code for causing the computerto integrate the bitstream object file with the instruction processorobject file to form the unified executable.